Constraints on interacting dark energy revisited: Implications for the Hubble tension

We revisit a class of coupled dark energy models where dark energy interacts with dark matter via phenomenological energy exchange terms. We include the perturbation of the Hubble rate in the interaction term, which was absent in previous works. We also consider more recent datasets such as cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies from Planck 2018, type I-a supernovae (SNIa) measurements from <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mi>Pantheon</a:mi><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:mrow></a:math> and data from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and redshift space distortions (RSD). One of the models presents a strong incompatibility when different cosmological datasets are used. We analyze the influence of the SH0ES Cepheid host distances on the results and, although for one model the discrepancy of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>H</c:mi><c:mn>0</c:mn></c:msub></c:math> is reduced to <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mn>3.2</e:mn><e:mi>σ</e:mi></e:math> when compared to the value obtained by the collaboration and <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mn>3.6</g:mn><g:mi>σ</g:mi></g:math> when compared to the SH0ES team, joint analysis is incompatible. Including BAO with RSD shows incompatibility with SH0ES for all models considered here. We perform a model comparison and, although there is a preference for interacting dark energy over <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</i:mi><i:mi>CDM</i:mi></i:math> for all of the models for joint analysis <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mrow><l:mi>CMB</l:mi><l:mo>+</l:mo><l:mi>BAO</l:mi><l:mo>+</l:mo><l:mi>RSD</l:mi><l:mo>+</l:mo><l:mi>SNIa</l:mi></l:mrow></l:math>, most of the 2D contours do not overlap. We conclude that the models of interactions in the dark sector considered in this paper are not flexible enough to fit all the cosmological data including values of <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:msub><n:mi>H</n:mi><n:mn>0</n:mn></n:msub></n:math> from SH0ES in a statistically acceptable way. Therefore, the addition of one extra degree of freedom (i.e., the coupling between dark matter and dark matter) does not help enough to alleviate the already existing tension in the vanilla <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><p:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</p:mi><p:mi>CDM</p:mi></p:math>, suggesting that the models would need to be modified to include further flexibility of predictions to help elucidate this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/6zrh-8fmv
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraints on interacting dark energy revisited: Implications for the Hubble tension

Élcio Abdalla, F. B. Abdalla, Ricardo G. Landim, Gabriel A. Hoerning et al.
8 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
9.24
article

Constraints on interacting dark energy revisited: Implications for the Hubble tension

Élcio Abdalla, F. B. Abdalla, Ricardo G. Landim, Gabriel A. Hoerning, Luiza O. Ponte, Raphael P. Rolim
article en
8 citations

Abstract

We revisit a class of coupled dark energy models where dark energy interacts with dark matter via phenomenological energy exchange terms. We include the perturbation of the Hubble rate in the interaction term, which was absent in previous works. We also consider more recent datasets such as cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies from Planck 2018, type I-a supernovae (SNIa) measurements from <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mi>Pantheon</a:mi><a:mo>+</a:mo></a:mrow></a:math> and data from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and redshift space distortions (RSD). One of the models presents a strong incompatibility when different cosmological datasets are used. We analyze the influence of the SH0ES Cepheid host distances on the results and, although for one model the discrepancy of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>H</c:mi><c:mn>0</c:mn></c:msub></c:math> is reduced to <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mn>3.2</e:mn><e:mi>σ</e:mi></e:math> when compared to the value obtained by the collaboration and <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mn>3.6</g:mn><g:mi>σ</g:mi></g:math> when compared to the SH0ES team, joint analysis is incompatible. Including BAO with RSD shows incompatibility with SH0ES for all models considered here. We perform a model comparison and, although there is a preference for interacting dark energy over <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</i:mi><i:mi>CDM</i:mi></i:math> for all of the models for joint analysis <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mrow><l:mi>CMB</l:mi><l:mo>+</l:mo><l:mi>BAO</l:mi><l:mo>+</l:mo><l:mi>RSD</l:mi><l:mo>+</l:mo><l:mi>SNIa</l:mi></l:mrow></l:math>, most of the 2D contours do not overlap. We conclude that the models of interactions in the dark sector considered in this paper are not flexible enough to fit all the cosmological data including values of <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:msub><n:mi>H</n:mi><n:mn>0</n:mn></n:msub></n:math> from SH0ES in a statistically acceptable way. Therefore, the addition of one extra degree of freedom (i.e., the coupling between dark matter and dark matter) does not help enough to alleviate the already existing tension in the vanilla <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><p:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</p:mi><p:mi>CDM</p:mi></p:math>, suggesting that the models would need to be modified to include further flexibility of predictions to help elucidate this issue.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(2)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (BR), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Rhodes University (ZA), University of Manchester (GB), Technical University of Munich (DE), University of Portsmouth (GB)
University of Manchester, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
9.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.