Global Characteristics and Outcomes of Massive Burn Injuries

Patients with massive burn injuries represent a unique patient cohort because they are associated with high morbidity and mortality while requiring high care intensity. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with massive burns (total body surface area ≥ 40%) versus those without, by utilizing the WHO Global Burn Registry. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic and burn characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression quantified the impact of massive burns on mortality, likelihood of surgical intervention, and functional impairment among survivors. Among 9274 patients in the database, 1828 (19.7%) had massive burns, with a median total body surface area of 55% (interquartile range: 45%-75%). These patients were predominantly managed in low-resource settings (60%) and sustained higher rates of inhalation injury (48% vs. 7%, P < .001) and flame-based burns (83% vs. 40%, P < .001) compared with the non-massive burns cohort. Logistic regression showed that massive burns increased the odds of mortality (OR 7.25, 95% CI 6.08-8.65) and functional impairment (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.004-1.81), while decreased the odds of undergoing surgical intervention (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.48-0.62). Massive burns significantly predict higher mortality and long-term functional challenges while reducing the likelihood of surgical intervention. These findings underscore the need for tailored management strategies and comprehensive rehabilitation for this high-risk population, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf113
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Characteristics and Outcomes of Massive Burn Injuries

Quincy Tran, Victor Stams, Raman Mehrzad, Hilary Y. Liu et al.
2 citations
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
2.71
article

Global Characteristics and Outcomes of Massive Burn Injuries

Quincy Tran, Victor Stams, Raman Mehrzad, Hilary Y. Liu, Erik Reiche, José Antonio Arellano, Fuat Barış Bengür, Francesco M. Egro, Daniel Najafali, Sameer A. Patel, Saeid Rezaei, Logan Galbraith, Megan Najafali, Mare G Kaulakis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Patients with massive burn injuries represent a unique patient cohort because they are associated with high morbidity and mortality while requiring high care intensity. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with massive burns (total body surface area ≥ 40%) versus those without, by utilizing the WHO Global Burn Registry. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic and burn characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression quantified the impact of massive burns on mortality, likelihood of surgical intervention, and functional impairment among survivors. Among 9274 patients in the database, 1828 (19.7%) had massive burns, with a median total body surface area of 55% (interquartile range: 45%-75%). These patients were predominantly managed in low-resource settings (60%) and sustained higher rates of inhalation injury (48% vs. 7%, P < .001) and flame-based burns (83% vs. 40%, P < .001) compared with the non-massive burns cohort. Logistic regression showed that massive burns increased the odds of mortality (OR 7.25, 95% CI 6.08-8.65) and functional impairment (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.004-1.81), while decreased the odds of undergoing surgical intervention (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.48-0.62). Massive burns significantly predict higher mortality and long-term functional challenges while reducing the likelihood of surgical intervention. These findings underscore the need for tailored management strategies and comprehensive rehabilitation for this high-risk population, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Journal of Burn Care & ResearchVol. 47(1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), Carle Foundation Hospital (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Illinois College (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), Temple University Health System (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Los Alamitos Medical Center (US), Temple University (US), Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.