Optimizing Human-Machine Interfaces for Neuroergonomics: Cognitive Workload and Performance in sUAS Operations

The growing prevalence of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) or Drones across industries, particularly, aerial photography and surveying, results in a need for a deeper understanding of how control interface design impacts operator cognitive workload and performance. This study evaluates the effects of gyroscopic and traditional joystick-based control systems on the operator’s cognitive workload as well as their mission performance under diverse environmental conditions. Participants perform standardized sUAS tasks while real-time electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring tracks cognitive workload via theta and alpha wave activity. Results indicate that gyroscopic controls, though intuitive, increase cognitive workload under high stress, whereas joystick controls provide more stability. Performance metrics show greater consistency with traditional controls, especially in demanding conditions. Insights from this study inform ergonomic improvements, tailored training, and real-time physiological monitoring for adaptive systems. By integrating neuroergonomics with human-machine interface design, this research advances sUAS usability, optimizing operator performance and safety in dynamic environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006227
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Human-Machine Interfaces for Neuroergonomics: Cognitive Workload and Performance in sUAS Operations

Suvipra Singh
AHFE international
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Optimizing Human-Machine Interfaces for Neuroergonomics: Cognitive Workload and Performance in sUAS Operations

Suvipra Singh
article en

Abstract

The growing prevalence of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) or Drones across industries, particularly, aerial photography and surveying, results in a need for a deeper understanding of how control interface design impacts operator cognitive workload and performance. This study evaluates the effects of gyroscopic and traditional joystick-based control systems on the operator’s cognitive workload as well as their mission performance under diverse environmental conditions. Participants perform standardized sUAS tasks while real-time electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring tracks cognitive workload via theta and alpha wave activity. Results indicate that gyroscopic controls, though intuitive, increase cognitive workload under high stress, whereas joystick controls provide more stability. Performance metrics show greater consistency with traditional controls, especially in demanding conditions. Insights from this study inform ergonomic improvements, tailored training, and real-time physiological monitoring for adaptive systems. By integrating neuroergonomics with human-machine interface design, this research advances sUAS usability, optimizing operator performance and safety in dynamic environments.

AHFE internationalVol. 195
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.