Toward Intuitive Interaction: A Cognitive Workflow Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction in Extended Reality Interfaces

Extended-Reality (XR) technologies promise to enhance human–robot interaction (HRI) by offering intuitive spatial interfaces and immersive input. However, traditional evaluation methods, such as task completion time, error rates, or NASA-TLX often obscure where cognitive and physical demands arise or are reduced within the interaction process. This study conducts a cognitive workflow analysis of XR interfaces by integrating established methodologies: Goal-Directed Task Analysis (GDTA), Norman’s Seven Stages of Action, and Applied Cognitive Task Analysis (ACTA). These methods collectively trace how interface design affects user cognition, from mission goals to task-level interactions, revealing specific gulfs of execution and evaluation. We apply this approach to compare two XR interface types: a grid-based menu and spatial affordance-based pop-ups, within an emergency-response scenario using Microsoft HoloLens 2. The analysis uncovers hidden cognitive challenges, such as inefficient visual search and occlusion issues, often missed by conventional metrics. The findings offer XR designers actionable insights into usability challenges and demonstrate how cognitive analysis can guide more intuitive interface development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006263
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Intuitive Interaction: A Cognitive Workflow Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction in Extended Reality Interfaces

Gim Song Soh, Pattaraorn Yu, Arisara Jiamsanguanwong
AHFE international
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Toward Intuitive Interaction: A Cognitive Workflow Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction in Extended Reality Interfaces

Gim Song Soh, Pattaraorn Yu, Arisara Jiamsanguanwong
article en

Abstract

Extended-Reality (XR) technologies promise to enhance human–robot interaction (HRI) by offering intuitive spatial interfaces and immersive input. However, traditional evaluation methods, such as task completion time, error rates, or NASA-TLX often obscure where cognitive and physical demands arise or are reduced within the interaction process. This study conducts a cognitive workflow analysis of XR interfaces by integrating established methodologies: Goal-Directed Task Analysis (GDTA), Norman’s Seven Stages of Action, and Applied Cognitive Task Analysis (ACTA). These methods collectively trace how interface design affects user cognition, from mission goals to task-level interactions, revealing specific gulfs of execution and evaluation. We apply this approach to compare two XR interface types: a grid-based menu and spatial affordance-based pop-ups, within an emergency-response scenario using Microsoft HoloLens 2. The analysis uncovers hidden cognitive challenges, such as inefficient visual search and occlusion issues, often missed by conventional metrics. The findings offer XR designers actionable insights into usability challenges and demonstrate how cognitive analysis can guide more intuitive interface development.

AHFE internationalVol. 195
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.