Is LLM a reliable risk detector? An evaluation of large language models in EMR-related medical incident detection

Medical institutions typically rely on manual analysis of adverse medical events, which requires significant human resources, time, and specialized knowledge and expertise. These requirements reduce the effectiveness of identifying potential risks. Can large language models (LLMs) leverage their powerful natural language processing capabilities to function as reliable risk detectors? In this pilot study, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in identifying electronic medical record system (EMR)-related medical incident risks. We first curated a dataset comprising 573 medical incident reports that had been manually analyzed. Then, using a few-shot prompting approach, we designed instructions to evaluate five LLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, DeepSeek V3, Nova Pro, and Llama 3.1-405b. The results indicated that the best-performing LLMs could accurately extract more than half of the risk factors and generate reasonable explanations grounded in real-world case contexts. While general-purpose LLMs can provide some assistance, further optimization tailored to specific medical scenarios is necessary to enhance their capability in handling complex cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006630
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is LLM a reliable risk detector? An evaluation of large language models in EMR-related medical incident detection

Xiuzhu Gu, Siyuan Zhang
AHFE international
Topic Modeling
article

Is LLM a reliable risk detector? An evaluation of large language models in EMR-related medical incident detection

Xiuzhu Gu, Siyuan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Medical institutions typically rely on manual analysis of adverse medical events, which requires significant human resources, time, and specialized knowledge and expertise. These requirements reduce the effectiveness of identifying potential risks. Can large language models (LLMs) leverage their powerful natural language processing capabilities to function as reliable risk detectors? In this pilot study, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in identifying electronic medical record system (EMR)-related medical incident risks. We first curated a dataset comprising 573 medical incident reports that had been manually analyzed. Then, using a few-shot prompting approach, we designed instructions to evaluate five LLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, DeepSeek V3, Nova Pro, and Llama 3.1-405b. The results indicated that the best-performing LLMs could accurately extract more than half of the risk factors and generate reasonable explanations grounded in real-world case contexts. While general-purpose LLMs can provide some assistance, further optimization tailored to specific medical scenarios is necessary to enhance their capability in handling complex cases.

AHFE internationalVol. 192
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is LLM a reliable risk detector? An evaluation of large language models in EMR-related medical incident detection — Xiuzhu Gu, Siyuan Zhang · AHFE international (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS