Evaluating Soft Keyboard Parameters for Tablet Productivity: Usability-Centric Layouts

The increasing diversity in tablet form factors and their use in productivity scenarios presents considerable complexity in soft keyboard design, necessitating updated guidelines for layout parameters to ensure usability across varying screen orientations. This study investigates how two core soft keyboard layout parameters, key size and key aspect ratio, influence user input performance and subjective experience on tablets across different screen sizes and orientations (portrait vs. landscape) in productivity-focused multilingual typing tasks. Two within-subjects experiments (N=20) were conducted using a portrait-mode Surface Pro 9 and a landscape-mode ASUS ZenBook 17-Fold OLED, testing five levels of key sizes (8-14mm portrait; 15-20mm landscape) and five levels of key aspect ratios (0.6:1-1:1 portrait; 1:1-1.4:1 landscape) respectively, collecting both objective performance data (WPM, TER) and subjective ratings (5 dimensions). Results indicate that while objective performance measures showed no significant differences for the tested parameters, subjective ratings strongly favored specific configurations: approximately 12mm keys in portrait mode and 17mm keys in landscape mode were preferred for key size, and aspect ratios of 0.9:1 (portrait) and 1.1:1 (landscape) were most favored, primarily driven by perceived comfort and usability. These findings underscore the critical role of context-dependency and subjective user experience in soft keyboard layout optimization for tablets, providing concrete, data-driven recommendations for designing more usable and contextually appropriate interfaces for productivity tasks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006674
Primary Topic
Usability and User Interface Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Soft Keyboard Parameters for Tablet Productivity: Usability-Centric Layouts

Jin-Kyu Kang, Yuan Xiang, Wei Wang, Ziyue Zhang et al.
AHFE international
Usability and User Interface Design
article

Evaluating Soft Keyboard Parameters for Tablet Productivity: Usability-Centric Layouts

Jin-Kyu Kang, Yuan Xiang, Wei Wang, Ziyue Zhang, Ye Sun, Xinyi Gao
article en

Abstract

The increasing diversity in tablet form factors and their use in productivity scenarios presents considerable complexity in soft keyboard design, necessitating updated guidelines for layout parameters to ensure usability across varying screen orientations. This study investigates how two core soft keyboard layout parameters, key size and key aspect ratio, influence user input performance and subjective experience on tablets across different screen sizes and orientations (portrait vs. landscape) in productivity-focused multilingual typing tasks. Two within-subjects experiments (N=20) were conducted using a portrait-mode Surface Pro 9 and a landscape-mode ASUS ZenBook 17-Fold OLED, testing five levels of key sizes (8-14mm portrait; 15-20mm landscape) and five levels of key aspect ratios (0.6:1-1:1 portrait; 1:1-1.4:1 landscape) respectively, collecting both objective performance data (WPM, TER) and subjective ratings (5 dimensions). Results indicate that while objective performance measures showed no significant differences for the tested parameters, subjective ratings strongly favored specific configurations: approximately 12mm keys in portrait mode and 17mm keys in landscape mode were preferred for key size, and aspect ratios of 0.9:1 (portrait) and 1.1:1 (landscape) were most favored, primarily driven by perceived comfort and usability. These findings underscore the critical role of context-dependency and subjective user experience in soft keyboard layout optimization for tablets, providing concrete, data-driven recommendations for designing more usable and contextually appropriate interfaces for productivity tasks.

AHFE internationalVol. 194
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Usability and User Interface Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.