Validation of quantitative transport mapping (QTM) with an ex vivo perfused liver model

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of a deep learning–based quantitative transport mapping method (QTMnet) for measuring total tissue perfusion. Methods QTMnet obtains tissue perfusion parametric maps from dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI images by training on simulated data. This data uses synthetic arterial and venous vasculature geometries with flow based on constrained constructive optimization. Gadolinium contrast agent distribution is governed by the transport‐forward problem, allowing us to generate a synthetic concentration spacetime profile for a given flow, blood volume fraction, and boundary condition. Tissue flows determined by QTMnet were compared to those obtained with traditional perfusion quantification (Kety equation with Tofts generalization), which uses a global arterial input function. Their total flow accuracies were validated on explanted porcine livers that were connected to an MR compatible flow pump with specified total flow rate for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI experiments. Results The mean total flow error for QTMnet was −0.34% ± 16.21% with range [−24.79%, 23.96%], compared to −35.74% ± 36.30% [−77.28%, 29.87%] for the Kety method. QTMnet provides 72% lower mean absolute error than the Kety method (12.15% vs. 43.21%, a 3.6‐fold reduction). Conclusion The fluid mechanics‐based QTMnet accurately estimates total tissue flow in liver explants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30581
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of quantitative transport mapping (QTM) with an ex vivo perfused liver model

Benjamin Weppner, İlhami Kovanlıkaya, Alexandra Roberts, Martin R. Prince et al.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Validation of quantitative transport mapping (QTM) with an ex vivo perfused liver model

Benjamin Weppner, İlhami Kovanlıkaya, Alexandra Roberts, Martin R. Prince, Dominick Romano, Mert Şişman, Renjiu Hu, Jian Shou, Alexey Dimov, Pascal Spincemaille, Yi Wang, Thanh D. Nguyen, Qihao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of a deep learning–based quantitative transport mapping method (QTMnet) for measuring total tissue perfusion. Methods QTMnet obtains tissue perfusion parametric maps from dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI images by training on simulated data. This data uses synthetic arterial and venous vasculature geometries with flow based on constrained constructive optimization. Gadolinium contrast agent distribution is governed by the transport‐forward problem, allowing us to generate a synthetic concentration spacetime profile for a given flow, blood volume fraction, and boundary condition. Tissue flows determined by QTMnet were compared to those obtained with traditional perfusion quantification (Kety equation with Tofts generalization), which uses a global arterial input function. Their total flow accuracies were validated on explanted porcine livers that were connected to an MR compatible flow pump with specified total flow rate for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI experiments. Results The mean total flow error for QTMnet was −0.34% ± 16.21% with range [−24.79%, 23.96%], compared to −35.74% ± 36.30% [−77.28%, 29.87%] for the Kety method. QTMnet provides 72% lower mean absolute error than the Kety method (12.15% vs. 43.21%, a 3.6‐fold reduction). Conclusion The fluid mechanics‐based QTMnet accurately estimates total tissue flow in liver explants.

Magnetic Resonance in MedicineVol. 94(4)
Cornell University (US), Columbia University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.