Effect of Hearing Status on Visual Reliance During Postural Control Performance

Athletes who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (D/HoH) have differing postural control performance differences compared with athletes who are hearing; however, no evidence exists regarding their reliance on visual information. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the visual reliance during postural control between athletes who are D/HoH and athletes who are hearing. Athletes who are D/HoH ( n = 22) and athletes who are hearing ( n = 24) completed the traditional modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance tasks with the addition of a third visual condition using stroboscopic vision glasses. Independent t tests revealed sway velocity Romberg ratios for eyes closed/eyes open on firm, eyes closed/eyes open on foam ( p = .01), and stroboscopic vision/eyes open on foam were different between groups ( p < .05 for all). Sway area Romberg ratios were not different ( p > .05). Findings may allow health care professionals to gauge recovery from injury in athletes who are D/HoH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Athletic Therapy & Training
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijatt.2024-0094
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Hearing Status on Visual Reliance During Postural Control Performance

Maria Talarico, James A. Oñate, Jaclyn B. Caccese, Matthew P. Brancaleone et al.
International Journal of Athletic Therapy & Training
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Effect of Hearing Status on Visual Reliance During Postural Control Performance

Maria Talarico, James A. Oñate, Jaclyn B. Caccese, Matthew P. Brancaleone, Dustin R. Grooms, Laura C. Boucher, Daniel M. Merfeld
article en

Abstract

Athletes who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (D/HoH) have differing postural control performance differences compared with athletes who are hearing; however, no evidence exists regarding their reliance on visual information. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the visual reliance during postural control between athletes who are D/HoH and athletes who are hearing. Athletes who are D/HoH ( n = 22) and athletes who are hearing ( n = 24) completed the traditional modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance tasks with the addition of a third visual condition using stroboscopic vision glasses. Independent t tests revealed sway velocity Romberg ratios for eyes closed/eyes open on firm, eyes closed/eyes open on foam ( p = .01), and stroboscopic vision/eyes open on foam were different between groups ( p < .05 for all). Sway area Romberg ratios were not different ( p > .05). Findings may allow health care professionals to gauge recovery from injury in athletes who are D/HoH.

International Journal of Athletic Therapy & TrainingVol. 30(5)
United States Army Medical Command (US), United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (US), Ohio University (US), United States Army Futures Command (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.