A Justification of Sophistry

The article examines the very first efforts to justify ancient sophistry made by G. W. F. Hegel and by G. Grote in the middle XIX century. The objective of the present article is to examine these early justifications of sophistry, with particular attention to the processes of reification of sophistry and the establishment of sophistry’s relationship with modern philosophy and modern society. In order to achieve this objective, the article seeks to address several issues: firstly, to identify the social institutions with which the authors of its justifications associate sophistry; secondly, to demonstrate the extent to which the very existence of sophistry is influenced by the regularities of the social circulation of philosophy; and thirdly, to establish a connection between the justification and rejuvenation of sophistry and a novel definition of the role of rhetoric in philosophical reasoning. Moreover, when taking into consideration two distinct rationalizations of sophistry, a comparative analysis between them is naturally inevitable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Liberal Arts University
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35853/vestnik.gu.2025.13-2.09
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Justification of Sophistry

Sergey A. Nikitin
Bulletin of Liberal Arts University
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

A Justification of Sophistry

Sergey A. Nikitin
article en

Abstract

The article examines the very first efforts to justify ancient sophistry made by G. W. F. Hegel and by G. Grote in the middle XIX century. The objective of the present article is to examine these early justifications of sophistry, with particular attention to the processes of reification of sophistry and the establishment of sophistry’s relationship with modern philosophy and modern society. In order to achieve this objective, the article seeks to address several issues: firstly, to identify the social institutions with which the authors of its justifications associate sophistry; secondly, to demonstrate the extent to which the very existence of sophistry is influenced by the regularities of the social circulation of philosophy; and thirdly, to establish a connection between the justification and rejuvenation of sophistry and a novel definition of the role of rhetoric in philosophical reasoning. Moreover, when taking into consideration two distinct rationalizations of sophistry, a comparative analysis between them is naturally inevitable.

Bulletin of Liberal Arts UniversityVol. 13(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.