A Collaborative Multiple Stressor Approach for Identifying Spatial Heterogeneities in Wildlife Health and Conservation Priorities

Wildlife face a number of extrinsic stressors, such as habitat loss, pathogen infections, and contaminant exposure, which can increase the energy needed to maintain optimal health and survival. These multiple extrinsic stressors can also occur simultaneously during intrinsically stressful life stages such as reproduction, migration, or hibernation. To fully understand how to support healthy wildlife populations, we must quantify physiological and immunological phenotypes across a variety of stressors. We pose a framework for conducting field studies to collect individual-level samples that can be used for measuring physiological and immunological phenotypes as well as the potentially stressful intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of those phenotypes. We suggest that collaborative efforts should then be made to create broader, spatially coordinated hypotheses for determining patterns of wildlife health under intrinsically stressful time periods and across extrinsically stressful landscapes. We provide an example and preliminary findings for this multi-stressor, collaborative, and spatially coordinated approach with an ongoing study of North American bat health. Quantifying direct and critical measures of wildlife health and identifying key intrinsic and extrinsic stressors that drive physiological and immunological phenotypes will provide broad targets for conservation strategies and where and when those strategies should be prioritized in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaf123
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Collaborative Multiple Stressor Approach for Identifying Spatial Heterogeneities in Wildlife Health and Conservation Priorities

Daniel J. Becker, Riley F. Bernard, Catherine G. Haase, Matthew M. Chumchal et al.
5 citations
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
15.13
article

A Collaborative Multiple Stressor Approach for Identifying Spatial Heterogeneities in Wildlife Health and Conservation Priorities

Daniel J. Becker, Riley F. Bernard, Catherine G. Haase, Matthew M. Chumchal, Tanya Dewey, Katelyn FitzGerald, Molly C. Simonis, Jeffrey T. Foster, Kevin T. Castle, Joy M. O’Keefe, Sarah Ciarrachi, Meagan Allira, Bret Demory, Kimberlee Whitmore, Kristin E Dyer, Dakota Van Parys, Jaleel Zubayr
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Wildlife face a number of extrinsic stressors, such as habitat loss, pathogen infections, and contaminant exposure, which can increase the energy needed to maintain optimal health and survival. These multiple extrinsic stressors can also occur simultaneously during intrinsically stressful life stages such as reproduction, migration, or hibernation. To fully understand how to support healthy wildlife populations, we must quantify physiological and immunological phenotypes across a variety of stressors. We pose a framework for conducting field studies to collect individual-level samples that can be used for measuring physiological and immunological phenotypes as well as the potentially stressful intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of those phenotypes. We suggest that collaborative efforts should then be made to create broader, spatially coordinated hypotheses for determining patterns of wildlife health under intrinsically stressful time periods and across extrinsically stressful landscapes. We provide an example and preliminary findings for this multi-stressor, collaborative, and spatially coordinated approach with an ongoing study of North American bat health. Quantifying direct and critical measures of wildlife health and identifying key intrinsic and extrinsic stressors that drive physiological and immunological phenotypes will provide broad targets for conservation strategies and where and when those strategies should be prioritized in the future.

Integrative and Comparative BiologyVol. 65(6)
University of Wyoming (US), Texas Christian University (US), Illinois Department of Natural Resources (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Austin Peay State University (US), Northern Arizona University (US), Life Services (United States) (US), Auburn University (US), University of Oklahoma (US), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, University of Oklahoma, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, National Institutes of Health, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Intelligence Community Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
15.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.