Countermovement Jump Propulsive Kinetics Distinguish Young Weightlifters Who Attain National Qualification

Morris, SJ, Oliver, JL, Pedley, JS, Kember, LS, Haff, GG, and Lloyd, RS. Countermovement jump propulsive kinetics distinguish young weightlifters who attain national qualification. J Strength Cond Res 39(10): 1080-1087, 2025-Researchers have explored the relationship between force-generating abilities and weightlifting performance in young athletes, but it remains unclear whether isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) and countermovement jump (CMJ) kinetics can distinguish between those who achieve national qualification and those who do not. This study aimed to (a) compare IMTP and CMJ kinetics between young weightlifters who did and did not attain national qualification and (b) identify kinetic variables that predict qualification. Thirty-seven young weightlifters were classified into 2 groups: those who qualified (QUAL; age = 17.1 ± 0.3 years, maturity offset = 3.13 ± 0.6 years, males = 15, females = 10) and those who did not qualify (DNQ; age = 15.8 ± 2.2 years, maturity offset = 2.7 ± 1.6 years, males = 6, females = 6). Subjects completed CMJ and IMTP tests on dual force plates. T-tests revealed that QUAL showed significantly ( p < 0.05) higher relative force at minimum displacement ( g = 0.82), average relative propulsive force ( g = 1.76), and average propulsive velocity during the CMJ ( g = 0.68), along with a shorter propulsive phase ( g = -1.22). In the IMTP, QUAL demonstrated higher relative peak force. Statistical parametric mapping revealed greater relative vertical force at 69-88% of movement time in QUAL, indicating higher force during the CMJ propulsive phase. Binary logistic regression identified CMJ average relative propulsive force and propulsive phase duration as significant predictors of qualification, with strong predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] = 0.910, p < 0.05 and AUC = 0.807, p < 0.05), highlighting the value of these variables when identifying and developing young weightlifters for national qualification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005187
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Training Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Countermovement Jump Propulsive Kinetics Distinguish Young Weightlifters Who Attain National Qualification

Jon L. Oliver, Lucy S. Kember, G. Gregory Haff, Rhodri S. Lloyd et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Physical Education and Training Studies
article

Countermovement Jump Propulsive Kinetics Distinguish Young Weightlifters Who Attain National Qualification

Jon L. Oliver, Lucy S. Kember, G. Gregory Haff, Rhodri S. Lloyd, Jason S. Pedley, Stephanie J. Morris
article en

Abstract

Morris, SJ, Oliver, JL, Pedley, JS, Kember, LS, Haff, GG, and Lloyd, RS. Countermovement jump propulsive kinetics distinguish young weightlifters who attain national qualification. J Strength Cond Res 39(10): 1080-1087, 2025-Researchers have explored the relationship between force-generating abilities and weightlifting performance in young athletes, but it remains unclear whether isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) and countermovement jump (CMJ) kinetics can distinguish between those who achieve national qualification and those who do not. This study aimed to (a) compare IMTP and CMJ kinetics between young weightlifters who did and did not attain national qualification and (b) identify kinetic variables that predict qualification. Thirty-seven young weightlifters were classified into 2 groups: those who qualified (QUAL; age = 17.1 ± 0.3 years, maturity offset = 3.13 ± 0.6 years, males = 15, females = 10) and those who did not qualify (DNQ; age = 15.8 ± 2.2 years, maturity offset = 2.7 ± 1.6 years, males = 6, females = 6). Subjects completed CMJ and IMTP tests on dual force plates. T-tests revealed that QUAL showed significantly ( p < 0.05) higher relative force at minimum displacement ( g = 0.82), average relative propulsive force ( g = 1.76), and average propulsive velocity during the CMJ ( g = 0.68), along with a shorter propulsive phase ( g = -1.22). In the IMTP, QUAL demonstrated higher relative peak force. Statistical parametric mapping revealed greater relative vertical force at 69-88% of movement time in QUAL, indicating higher force during the CMJ propulsive phase. Binary logistic regression identified CMJ average relative propulsive force and propulsive phase duration as significant predictors of qualification, with strong predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] = 0.910, p < 0.05 and AUC = 0.807, p < 0.05), highlighting the value of these variables when identifying and developing young weightlifters for national qualification.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 39(10)
Edith Cowan University (AU), Waikato Institute of Technology (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), University of Salford (GB), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Physical Education and Training Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.