Chatbot-fictionalism and empathetic AI: Should we worry about AI when AI worries about us?

We focus on recent proposals to interpret interactions with empathetic AI systems as games of make-believe, analogous to our engagement with fictions. Chatbots are increasingly designed to detect and emulate emotional nuance, resembling real human interactions. These applications have raised ethical concerns. Critics focus on the potentially harmful effects of people's tendency to anthropomorphize the chatbots - to respond to them as if they were real persons - potentially leaving users vulnerable to emotional dependency, exploitation, loss of autonomy and delusion. How worried should we be about these developments? According to some philosophers, not very. Chatbot-fictionalist maintain that one interacts with these chatbots analogous to our engagement with interactive fictions. We argue that although chatbot-fictionalism offers insights into human-AI interaction, it does not resolve the ethical concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Psychology
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2025.2525320
Citations
3
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chatbot-fictionalism and empathetic AI: Should we worry about AI when AI worries about us?

Stacie Friend, Kris Goffin
3 citations
Philosophical Psychology
AI in Service Interactions
7.44
article

Chatbot-fictionalism and empathetic AI: Should we worry about AI when AI worries about us?

Stacie Friend, Kris Goffin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We focus on recent proposals to interpret interactions with empathetic AI systems as games of make-believe, analogous to our engagement with fictions. Chatbots are increasingly designed to detect and emulate emotional nuance, resembling real human interactions. These applications have raised ethical concerns. Critics focus on the potentially harmful effects of people's tendency to anthropomorphize the chatbots - to respond to them as if they were real persons - potentially leaving users vulnerable to emotional dependency, exploitation, loss of autonomy and delusion. How worried should we be about these developments? According to some philosophers, not very. Chatbot-fictionalist maintain that one interacts with these chatbots analogous to our engagement with interactive fictions. We argue that although chatbot-fictionalism offers insights into human-AI interaction, it does not resolve the ethical concerns.

Philosophical Psychology
University of Antwerp (BE), Maastricht University (NL), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
AI in Service Interactions
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.