THE LINGUOPRAGMATIC POTENTIAL OF THE TRANSMISSION-FINAL FULL STOP IN CHAT COMMUNICATION

The article aims at disclosing and comparing the attitudes towards the pragmatic function of a transmission-final full stop that were elicited from the anonymous responses to a questionnaire issued in two parts: in November – December, 2024 and in February, 2025. The present article adds to the studies by domestic and foreign researchers that have been devoted to the perception of a full stop as reflected in the body of text data obtained in the course of psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic experiments. The novelty of the paper is determined by bringing into clear focus a group of respondents of a wider age range, namely, 15 to 47 years old. The results of the current research confirm the conclusions presented in previous papers by other scholars. In particular, it is confirmed that a transmission-final full stop in group chats is losing its function as a marker of the end of a declarative sentence while gaining new meanings not characteristic of it before, such as formality and seriousness of the conversation, passive aggression, etc. It is also noted that the perception of a full stop as a marker of aggression is an important interpretation, which is not the only one, though, as many respondents aged 15 to 30 regard a transmission-final full stop as a non-obligatory mark, to which the addressee can be fairly indifferent. The leading linguopragmatic functions of this punctuation mark as singled out by the respondents at the age of 15 to 30 are the shutting down of the conversation (according to the literary norm as well), designating the official tone of the conversation and the explication of emotional assessment as well as influence on the addressee’s psychological state. The material on which the article is based, that is, the facts of linguistic reflection and assessments provided by the Russian language speakers, also shows that the rule prescribing that a full stop shall be used at the end of a sentence and reflecting the strict literary norm is considered by many users as a mere recommendation, and a full stop is becoming a non-obligatory punctuation mark.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Notes of V I Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Philological sciences
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-1679-2025-11-2-178-186
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE LINGUOPRAGMATIC POTENTIAL OF THE TRANSMISSION-FINAL FULL STOP IN CHAT COMMUNICATION

Marina Kalinina, Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Isakovich, M. Zaharova
Scientific Notes of V I Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Philological sciences
Digital Communication and Language
article

THE LINGUOPRAGMATIC POTENTIAL OF THE TRANSMISSION-FINAL FULL STOP IN CHAT COMMUNICATION

Marina Kalinina, Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Isakovich, M. Zaharova
article en

Abstract

The article aims at disclosing and comparing the attitudes towards the pragmatic function of a transmission-final full stop that were elicited from the anonymous responses to a questionnaire issued in two parts: in November – December, 2024 and in February, 2025. The present article adds to the studies by domestic and foreign researchers that have been devoted to the perception of a full stop as reflected in the body of text data obtained in the course of psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic experiments. The novelty of the paper is determined by bringing into clear focus a group of respondents of a wider age range, namely, 15 to 47 years old. The results of the current research confirm the conclusions presented in previous papers by other scholars. In particular, it is confirmed that a transmission-final full stop in group chats is losing its function as a marker of the end of a declarative sentence while gaining new meanings not characteristic of it before, such as formality and seriousness of the conversation, passive aggression, etc. It is also noted that the perception of a full stop as a marker of aggression is an important interpretation, which is not the only one, though, as many respondents aged 15 to 30 regard a transmission-final full stop as a non-obligatory mark, to which the addressee can be fairly indifferent. The leading linguopragmatic functions of this punctuation mark as singled out by the respondents at the age of 15 to 30 are the shutting down of the conversation (according to the literary norm as well), designating the official tone of the conversation and the explication of emotional assessment as well as influence on the addressee’s psychological state. The material on which the article is based, that is, the facts of linguistic reflection and assessments provided by the Russian language speakers, also shows that the rule prescribing that a full stop shall be used at the end of a sentence and reflecting the strict literary norm is considered by many users as a mere recommendation, and a full stop is becoming a non-obligatory punctuation mark.

Scientific Notes of V I Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Philological sciencesVol. 11(2)
Volgograd Municipal Institute of Arts (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Digital Communication and Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.