WAYS OF EXPRESSING DEONTIC MODALITY IN THE ENGLISH, CRIMEAN TATAR AND ARABIC LANGUAGES

The article deals with the types of linguistic gender markers and the general principles of their use in the process of constructing femininity models in the discourse of Turkish everyday and literary speech. The article examines the explicit attitude of society to the feminine principle in Turkish and the use of gender-marked vocabulary as a means of conveying various connotations. The lexicographic material of the article includes gender-marked lexical units containing in one form or another an indication of gender, words with evaluative semes serving to characterize women and various phenomena. The vocabulary containing gender markers according to the metaphorical principle was identified: 1) nominations representing biological characteristics of females; 2) a group of artifactomorphisms using physiological similarity or similarity of character/temper of a woman; 3) mythomorphisms; 4) nominations using indications of a woman’s age and her status in the family/marriage. A separate group consists of names in which the semantic features of the female gender are also supported by a morphological indicator and female names. A tendency to form negatively connoted gender-marked neologisms is recorded. This gives an idea of how external features of femininity, entrenched in Turkish culture, are extrapolated by the language to vocabulary not associated with biological gender: phytonyms, zoonyms, artifacts, etc. — based on external or internal similarity. The methods of morphological transmission of the semantic feature of gender in borrowed words are noted. A lexical way of transmitting the feature of female gender using the word kadın («woman») is also indicated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Notes of V I Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Philological sciences
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-1679-2025-11-2-131-137
Primary Topic
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WAYS OF EXPRESSING DEONTIC MODALITY IN THE ENGLISH, CRIMEAN TATAR AND ARABIC LANGUAGES

Lenyara Sh. Dzhelilova
Scientific Notes of V I Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Philological sciences
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
article

WAYS OF EXPRESSING DEONTIC MODALITY IN THE ENGLISH, CRIMEAN TATAR AND ARABIC LANGUAGES

Lenyara Sh. Dzhelilova
article en

Abstract

The article deals with the types of linguistic gender markers and the general principles of their use in the process of constructing femininity models in the discourse of Turkish everyday and literary speech. The article examines the explicit attitude of society to the feminine principle in Turkish and the use of gender-marked vocabulary as a means of conveying various connotations. The lexicographic material of the article includes gender-marked lexical units containing in one form or another an indication of gender, words with evaluative semes serving to characterize women and various phenomena. The vocabulary containing gender markers according to the metaphorical principle was identified: 1) nominations representing biological characteristics of females; 2) a group of artifactomorphisms using physiological similarity or similarity of character/temper of a woman; 3) mythomorphisms; 4) nominations using indications of a woman’s age and her status in the family/marriage. A separate group consists of names in which the semantic features of the female gender are also supported by a morphological indicator and female names. A tendency to form negatively connoted gender-marked neologisms is recorded. This gives an idea of how external features of femininity, entrenched in Turkish culture, are extrapolated by the language to vocabulary not associated with biological gender: phytonyms, zoonyms, artifacts, etc. — based on external or internal similarity. The methods of morphological transmission of the semantic feature of gender in borrowed words are noted. A lexical way of transmitting the feature of female gender using the word kadın («woman») is also indicated.

Scientific Notes of V I Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Philological sciencesVol. 11(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.