Are the business strategies of Korean family firms innovation-oriented?

Purpose This study investigates the relationship between the business strategies of Korean family firms and firm growth opportunities and corporate value. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a quantitative research design and draws on organizational theory and Miles and Snow’s (1978, 2003) business strategy typology. The sample includes family firms listed on the Korean Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (KOSDAQ) from 2011 to 2019. The results are analyzed using multivariate analysis. Findings The results show that Korean family businesses with more innovative prospector business strategies tend to have stronger management capacity to capitalize on their growth opportunities and enhance their market value. Research limitations/implications The findings challenge the common perception that family ownership is inherently less innovative and more focused on defensive strategies driven by private profit extraction through family control. The findings bridge the gap between the predictions of the family control perspective and agency theory, and support the findings of Gerulaitiene et al. (2024) that having more family members involved in the business leads to better innovation outcomes. Originality/value Approximately 70% of Korean firms are family-founded and tend to be more hierarchical and patriarchal as compared to their counterparts in the US and Europe. These unique features provide an ideal setting to better understand strategic behaviors of Korean family firms and to test the study hypotheses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of strategy and management
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-10-2023-0277
Primary Topic
Family Business Performance and Succession
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are the business strategies of Korean family firms innovation-oriented?

Kriengkrai Boonlert‐U‐Thai, Munsoo Choi
Journal of strategy and management
Family Business Performance and Succession
article

Are the business strategies of Korean family firms innovation-oriented?

Kriengkrai Boonlert‐U‐Thai, Munsoo Choi
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the relationship between the business strategies of Korean family firms and firm growth opportunities and corporate value. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a quantitative research design and draws on organizational theory and Miles and Snow’s (1978, 2003) business strategy typology. The sample includes family firms listed on the Korean Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (KOSDAQ) from 2011 to 2019. The results are analyzed using multivariate analysis. Findings The results show that Korean family businesses with more innovative prospector business strategies tend to have stronger management capacity to capitalize on their growth opportunities and enhance their market value. Research limitations/implications The findings challenge the common perception that family ownership is inherently less innovative and more focused on defensive strategies driven by private profit extraction through family control. The findings bridge the gap between the predictions of the family control perspective and agency theory, and support the findings of Gerulaitiene et al. (2024) that having more family members involved in the business leads to better innovation outcomes. Originality/value Approximately 70% of Korean firms are family-founded and tend to be more hierarchical and patriarchal as compared to their counterparts in the US and Europe. These unique features provide an ideal setting to better understand strategic behaviors of Korean family firms and to test the study hypotheses.

Journal of strategy and managementVol. 18(3)
Soongsil University (KR), Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Family Business Performance and Succession
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.