Reconciling Structuralism and History: Michel Foucault’s Epistemological Revision of an Enduring Tension

This article addresses the problematic relationship between structuralism and history in the thought of Michel Foucault, particularly regarding whether it is characterised by opposition or compatibility or, more precisely, whether the opposition between them persists.While reconciliation between the two had previously been deemed unlikely in the structuralist linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure , subsequent efforts have emerged to resolve this conflict.Among these is Michel Foucault's contribution, which highlights the following key points: the assertion that the concept of structure represents a transcendence of the biological-evolutionary interpretation of history rather than of history itself; the synchronic dimension of structure has acquired a historical character and the principles of transformation and the distancing from interpretation have become shared factors between history and structuralism.This reconciliation has been made possible through methodological revision within the structuralist framework and the historical approach.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56334/sei/8.8.10
Primary Topic
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciling Structuralism and History: Michel Foucault’s Epistemological Revision of an Enduring Tension

Merzougui Gouraria Halima, Souarit Benamar
1 links
Science Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
article

Reconciling Structuralism and History: Michel Foucault’s Epistemological Revision of an Enduring Tension

Merzougui Gouraria Halima, Souarit Benamar
article en

Abstract

This article addresses the problematic relationship between structuralism and history in the thought of Michel Foucault, particularly regarding whether it is characterised by opposition or compatibility or, more precisely, whether the opposition between them persists.While reconciliation between the two had previously been deemed unlikely in the structuralist linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure , subsequent efforts have emerged to resolve this conflict.Among these is Michel Foucault's contribution, which highlights the following key points: the assertion that the concept of structure represents a transcendence of the biological-evolutionary interpretation of history rather than of history itself; the synchronic dimension of structure has acquired a historical character and the principles of transformation and the distancing from interpretation have become shared factors between history and structuralism.This reconciliation has been made possible through methodological revision within the structuralist framework and the historical approach.

Science Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern ProblemsVol. 8(8)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.