Evaluating the impact of sandy surface contamination on trace DNA recovery from wearable fabrics: A comparative study of collection methods and extraction kits

Touch DNA evidence plays a pivotal role in forensic investigations, particularly in the absence of visible biological fluids. However, trace DNA recovery is influenced by multiple factors, including substrate type, collection technique, extraction method, and environmental exposure. Despite widespread adoption of both cotton swabbing and tapelifting methods, little is known about their comparative performance under real-world environmental stressors such as sand contamination, which is common in arid and desert regions. This study evaluated the efficiency of two collection methods Copan cotton swabs (CS) and SceneSafe Fast™ minitapes (MT) and two DNA extraction kits PrepFiler Express BTA™ and QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit in recovering Touch DNA from 100 fabric-based items (face masks, T-shirts, and caps) exposed to sandy outdoor environments. DNA concentration, STR profile completeness, and total allele count were analyzed using standardized protocols. Statistical methods included factorial ANOVA, chi-square analysis, and Pearson correlation to assess method performance and inter-variable relationships. Cotton swabs consistently outperformed minitapes in DNA yield and profile integrity across all fabric types. The combination of cotton swabs with Prep Filer extraction produced the highest DNA concentrations (mean >2.0 ng/μL) and yielded full STR profiles in a majority of cases. In contrast, minitape sampling, particularly when combined with QIAamp extraction, resulted in lower recovery and an increased rate of partial or mixed profiles. A strong positive correlation (r > 0.8) was observed between DNA concentration and STR profile completeness. These findings indicate that adhesive-based sampling methods are substantially hindered by sand interference, reducing their forensic value in contaminated conditions. The results emphasize the need for adaptive forensic DNA protocols that account for environmental contaminants such as sand. Cotton swabbing in combination with Prep Filer Express BTA™ extraction represents a robust and reliable strategy for maximizing trace DNA recovery from wearable items in sandy or dusty outdoor settings. This research provides critical guidance for improving DNA evidence collection in real-world casework and supports the development of optimized trace DNA workflows for challenging environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.26.3.2441
Primary Topic
Conservation Techniques and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the impact of sandy surface contamination on trace DNA recovery from wearable fabrics: A comparative study of collection methods and extraction kits

William Goodwin, Salem K Alketbi
1 links
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
Conservation Techniques and Studies
article

Evaluating the impact of sandy surface contamination on trace DNA recovery from wearable fabrics: A comparative study of collection methods and extraction kits

William Goodwin, Salem K Alketbi
article en

Abstract

Touch DNA evidence plays a pivotal role in forensic investigations, particularly in the absence of visible biological fluids. However, trace DNA recovery is influenced by multiple factors, including substrate type, collection technique, extraction method, and environmental exposure. Despite widespread adoption of both cotton swabbing and tapelifting methods, little is known about their comparative performance under real-world environmental stressors such as sand contamination, which is common in arid and desert regions. This study evaluated the efficiency of two collection methods Copan cotton swabs (CS) and SceneSafe Fast™ minitapes (MT) and two DNA extraction kits PrepFiler Express BTA™ and QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit in recovering Touch DNA from 100 fabric-based items (face masks, T-shirts, and caps) exposed to sandy outdoor environments. DNA concentration, STR profile completeness, and total allele count were analyzed using standardized protocols. Statistical methods included factorial ANOVA, chi-square analysis, and Pearson correlation to assess method performance and inter-variable relationships. Cotton swabs consistently outperformed minitapes in DNA yield and profile integrity across all fabric types. The combination of cotton swabs with Prep Filer extraction produced the highest DNA concentrations (mean >2.0 ng/μL) and yielded full STR profiles in a majority of cases. In contrast, minitape sampling, particularly when combined with QIAamp extraction, resulted in lower recovery and an increased rate of partial or mixed profiles. A strong positive correlation (r > 0.8) was observed between DNA concentration and STR profile completeness. These findings indicate that adhesive-based sampling methods are substantially hindered by sand interference, reducing their forensic value in contaminated conditions. The results emphasize the need for adaptive forensic DNA protocols that account for environmental contaminants such as sand. Cotton swabbing in combination with Prep Filer Express BTA™ extraction represents a robust and reliable strategy for maximizing trace DNA recovery from wearable items in sandy or dusty outdoor settings. This research provides critical guidance for improving DNA evidence collection in real-world casework and supports the development of optimized trace DNA workflows for challenging environments.

World Journal of Advanced Research and ReviewsVol. 26(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Conservation Techniques and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.