Clinical Psychology in the Post- <i>Dobbs</i> Era: Navigating Clinical Practice, Research, and Advocacy in a Changing Sexual- and Reproductive-Health Landscape

Since 2022, following the <i>Dobbs</i> decision by the United States Supreme Court, abortion restrictions have increased throughout the country. This represents the most recent phase of decades of political and legal restrictions on abortion access, including the 1976 Hyde Amendment restricting federal funds for abortion services. Limiting access to legal abortion and safe reproductive healthcare has serious implications for the mental health of people who can become pregnant, and thus for clinical psychology. However, there are gaps in competence around sexual and reproductive health (SRH) for clinical psychologists in research and practice. In this paper, we 1) review empirical evidence regarding abortion and mental health, 2) discuss barriers to SRH competence for clinical psychology, and 3) present guiding principles for psychologists and institutions/training programs to address these competence gaps across research, clinical practice, and advocacy. We focus on clinical psychology, but the content is applicable to behavioral health disciplines broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251346150
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Psychology in the Post- Dobbs Era: Navigating Clinical Practice, Research, and Advocacy in a Changing Sexual- and Reproductive-Health Landscape

Stefanie Sequeira, David Ley, Irene Tung, Christine C. Call et al.
Clinical Psychological Science
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Clinical Psychology in the Post- Dobbs Era: Navigating Clinical Practice, Research, and Advocacy in a Changing Sexual- and Reproductive-Health Landscape

Stefanie Sequeira, David Ley, Irene Tung, Christine C. Call, Debora J. Bell, Cassandra L. Boness, Kristen Eckstrand, Alexandra R. Tabachnick, Orma Ravindranath, Lindsay Sortor, Lucy Ogbu-Nwobodo
article en

Abstract

Since 2022, following the <i>Dobbs</i> decision by the United States Supreme Court, abortion restrictions have increased throughout the country. This represents the most recent phase of decades of political and legal restrictions on abortion access, including the 1976 Hyde Amendment restricting federal funds for abortion services. Limiting access to legal abortion and safe reproductive healthcare has serious implications for the mental health of people who can become pregnant, and thus for clinical psychology. However, there are gaps in competence around sexual and reproductive health (SRH) for clinical psychologists in research and practice. In this paper, we 1) review empirical evidence regarding abortion and mental health, 2) discuss barriers to SRH competence for clinical psychology, and 3) present guiding principles for psychologists and institutions/training programs to address these competence gaps across research, clinical practice, and advocacy. We focus on clinical psychology, but the content is applicable to behavioral health disciplines broadly.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 14(1)
University of New Mexico (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), California State University, Dominguez Hills (US), University of Virginia (US), University of Missouri (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.