Machine-Learning Applications in Eating-Disorder-Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Scoping Review

Eating disorders (EDs) are complex and debilitating conditions. Prior efforts to predict outcomes (onset, prognosis, treatment response) have yielded inconsistent findings. Machine-learning (ML) techniques have shown promise to improve outcome prediction, but a systematic literature synthesis is missing. We conducted a systematic scoping review to summarize extant literature on ML applications in ED-outcome-prediction research, identifying 75 studies. ML has mostly been used to predict ED diagnostic status ( k = 45); other studies have predicted escalation of ED risk and symptoms ( k = 13), treatment outcomes ( k = 12), and ED onset ( k = 6). Decision trees, random forest, and support-vector machines were the most common models used. Although many studies reported moderate to high predictive performance, the benefits of ML over traditional statistical techniques remains unclear in light of inconsistent findings. We make several recommendations for future research (i.e., integrating multiple data types, external validation) to encourage continued progress in this developing field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251340348
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine-Learning Applications in Eating-Disorder-Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Scoping Review

Jake Linardon, Matthew Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, Zoe McClure, Mariel Messer
3 citations
Clinical Psychological Science
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
6.92
article

Machine-Learning Applications in Eating-Disorder-Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Scoping Review

Jake Linardon, Matthew Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, Zoe McClure, Mariel Messer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Eating disorders (EDs) are complex and debilitating conditions. Prior efforts to predict outcomes (onset, prognosis, treatment response) have yielded inconsistent findings. Machine-learning (ML) techniques have shown promise to improve outcome prediction, but a systematic literature synthesis is missing. We conducted a systematic scoping review to summarize extant literature on ML applications in ED-outcome-prediction research, identifying 75 studies. ML has mostly been used to predict ED diagnostic status ( k = 45); other studies have predicted escalation of ED risk and symptoms ( k = 13), treatment outcomes ( k = 12), and ED onset ( k = 6). Decision trees, random forest, and support-vector machines were the most common models used. Although many studies reported moderate to high predictive performance, the benefits of ML over traditional statistical techniques remains unclear in light of inconsistent findings. We make several recommendations for future research (i.e., integrating multiple data types, external validation) to encourage continued progress in this developing field.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 13(6)
Deakin University (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.