Vision, gender, and context: examining visioning styles in men and women leaders across three contexts

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore how men and women leaders describe vision as part of their leadership behavior across three contexts (military, private business, and government). Design/methodology/approach Data from semi-structured interviews conducted with 66 senior leaders across Canada were analyzed. Findings Both men and women leaders across contexts perceive vision to be important. However, vision was perceived to be least important in the government context. Some gender similarities and differences in visioning styles were also noted across contexts. Men and women in the military utilized a more directive visionary leadership style. In private business, men reported more directive approaches to vision than women, who were primarily participative. In government, men reported more participative approaches than women, who were primarily directive. Explanations for these findings are discussed. Originality/value This is the first study to qualitatively explore how men and women leaders perceive and describe their use of organizational vision across three different contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-05-2025-0341
Primary Topic
Organizational Strategy and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vision, gender, and context: examining visioning styles in men and women leaders across three contexts

Kara A. Arnold, Catherine Loughlin, Megan M. Walsh, Danielle Prowse
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Organizational Strategy and Culture
article

Vision, gender, and context: examining visioning styles in men and women leaders across three contexts

Kara A. Arnold, Catherine Loughlin, Megan M. Walsh, Danielle Prowse
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore how men and women leaders describe vision as part of their leadership behavior across three contexts (military, private business, and government). Design/methodology/approach Data from semi-structured interviews conducted with 66 senior leaders across Canada were analyzed. Findings Both men and women leaders across contexts perceive vision to be important. However, vision was perceived to be least important in the government context. Some gender similarities and differences in visioning styles were also noted across contexts. Men and women in the military utilized a more directive visionary leadership style. In private business, men reported more directive approaches to vision than women, who were primarily participative. In government, men reported more participative approaches than women, who were primarily directive. Explanations for these findings are discussed. Originality/value This is the first study to qualitatively explore how men and women leaders perceive and describe their use of organizational vision across three different contexts.

Leadership & Organization Development JournalVol. 46(4)
Dalhousie University (CA), University of Saint Mary (US), Saint Mary's University of Minnesota (US), Inner Health (US), Florida Memorial University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Organizational Strategy and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Vision, gender, and context: examining visioning styles in men and women leaders across three contexts — Kara A. Arnold, Catherine Loughlin, et al. · Leadership & Organization Development Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS