Towards a geopolitical economy of esports: making sense of Saudi Arabia’s investments

Purpose This study aims to argue that the esports industry is structured by geopolitical economic dynamics and must be understood through a geopolitical economic lens. Focusing on Saudi Arabia’s substantial investments in esports – both domestically and internationally – as part of its soft power strategy, the authors examine the geopolitical economy of the industry. As esports organisations grow increasingly reliant on Saudi capital, researchers concerned with the long-term sustainability of professional gaming should scrutinise these emerging geopolitical entanglements. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a methodology grounded in a geopolitical economic framework, which views nation states and other actors as using esports to advance geopolitical and economic objectives. To operationalise this framework, the authors conducted a trade press analysis (Corrigan, 2018) on industry reports, mass media and financial publications and the enthusiast press. Findings The analysis reveals the increased role of state-sponsored esports initiatives, particularly through entities like the Savvy Gaming Group and other state-sponsored investment groups. The authors also uncovered a notable decline in corporate esports investment in 2023, which has elevated both the relative and absolute significance of state-sponsored events. Originality/value This study offers original insights into the economic and social sustainability of esports by situating its analysis within the framework of the geopolitical economy of sports. The authors identify a distinct phase in the esports industry characterised by digital globalisation, shifting investment patterns and increased state involvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Team Performance Management
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-09-2024-0111
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital Games and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a geopolitical economy of esports: making sense of Saudi Arabia’s investments

William Clyde Partin, Tom Brock, Daniel Joseph
4 citations
Team Performance Management
Digital Games and Media
16.81
article

Towards a geopolitical economy of esports: making sense of Saudi Arabia’s investments

William Clyde Partin, Tom Brock, Daniel Joseph
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to argue that the esports industry is structured by geopolitical economic dynamics and must be understood through a geopolitical economic lens. Focusing on Saudi Arabia’s substantial investments in esports – both domestically and internationally – as part of its soft power strategy, the authors examine the geopolitical economy of the industry. As esports organisations grow increasingly reliant on Saudi capital, researchers concerned with the long-term sustainability of professional gaming should scrutinise these emerging geopolitical entanglements. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a methodology grounded in a geopolitical economic framework, which views nation states and other actors as using esports to advance geopolitical and economic objectives. To operationalise this framework, the authors conducted a trade press analysis (Corrigan, 2018) on industry reports, mass media and financial publications and the enthusiast press. Findings The analysis reveals the increased role of state-sponsored esports initiatives, particularly through entities like the Savvy Gaming Group and other state-sponsored investment groups. The authors also uncovered a notable decline in corporate esports investment in 2023, which has elevated both the relative and absolute significance of state-sponsored events. Originality/value This study offers original insights into the economic and social sustainability of esports by situating its analysis within the framework of the geopolitical economy of sports. The authors identify a distinct phase in the esports industry characterised by digital globalisation, shifting investment patterns and increased state involvement.

Team Performance ManagementVol. 31(5-6)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Games and Media
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.