Exploring Wheat Farmers’ Soil Health Management Practices, Adoption Characteristics, and Information Preferences

Healthy soil is critical to feeding and sustaining healthy human and animal populations and ensuring the land is productive for years to come, yet farmers often hesitate to adopt soil health management practices despite their benefits. This highlights a need for education and targeted communication strategies to encourage adoption. Our qualitative study aimed to explore soil health management practices of wheat farmers in Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 farmers to determine their soil health management practices, adoption characteristics, and information and communication preferences. We found farmers describe healthy soil three ways: healthy soil is a living biome, healthy soil has texture and structure, and healthy soil is a costly responsibility. The farmers managed soil health using tillage methods and technology implementation (e.g., heavy equipment, soil testing, fertilizing) and managed soil health to preserve the land for future generations, control erosion, and improve their bottom line. Wheat farmers choose to adopt or reject soil health management practices: long-term benefits of soil fertility, financial, climatological and environmental, information from neighbors, traditional, and functionality and necessity. Farmers preferred to receive information from Extension specialists, university faculty, and crop consultants as well as themselves. In addition, extension-sponsored field days and demonstrations were farmers’ most preferred communication mediums. Our findings inform programming focused on scientific principles of soil and soil, on how farmers can know when they have reached the scientific pinnacles of healthy soil, and on perspectives and achievements of peers who possess expertise in soil health practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Communications
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2554
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Wheat Farmers’ Soil Health Management Practices, Adoption Characteristics, and Information Preferences

Karissa Palmer, Michele Florencia Victoria, Holli R. Leggette, Haly Neely et al.
1 links
Journal of Applied Communications
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
article

Exploring Wheat Farmers’ Soil Health Management Practices, Adoption Characteristics, and Information Preferences

Karissa Palmer, Michele Florencia Victoria, Holli R. Leggette, Haly Neely, Clark Neely, Jamie M. Foster, Morgan Orem
article en

Abstract

Healthy soil is critical to feeding and sustaining healthy human and animal populations and ensuring the land is productive for years to come, yet farmers often hesitate to adopt soil health management practices despite their benefits. This highlights a need for education and targeted communication strategies to encourage adoption. Our qualitative study aimed to explore soil health management practices of wheat farmers in Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 farmers to determine their soil health management practices, adoption characteristics, and information and communication preferences. We found farmers describe healthy soil three ways: healthy soil is a living biome, healthy soil has texture and structure, and healthy soil is a costly responsibility. The farmers managed soil health using tillage methods and technology implementation (e.g., heavy equipment, soil testing, fertilizing) and managed soil health to preserve the land for future generations, control erosion, and improve their bottom line. Wheat farmers choose to adopt or reject soil health management practices: long-term benefits of soil fertility, financial, climatological and environmental, information from neighbors, traditional, and functionality and necessity. Farmers preferred to receive information from Extension specialists, university faculty, and crop consultants as well as themselves. In addition, extension-sponsored field days and demonstrations were farmers’ most preferred communication mediums. Our findings inform programming focused on scientific principles of soil and soil, on how farmers can know when they have reached the scientific pinnacles of healthy soil, and on perspectives and achievements of peers who possess expertise in soil health practices.

Journal of Applied CommunicationsVol. 109(1)
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.