Is occupation insecurity associated with conspiracy views? A test of parallel mediation through political powerlessness and relative deprivation

We examine the association of a novel form of insecurity (occupation insecurity) with three societal attitudes: the belief in conspiracy views, political powerlessness and relative deprivation. This answers the call in the literature to extend studies on work-related insecurity by broadening its conceptualization and extending its associations with a broader set of outcomes. Next, we explore whether the association between occupation insecurity and conspiracy views is mediated by both societal attitudes: political powerlessness and relative deprivation. The study took place during the Covid crisis in 2020. Consequently, all variables were framed in the context of this crisis. Cross-sectional data gathered via an online survey among 1324 employed wage and salary earners in Flanders (Belgium) are used to test the hypotheses. The data were analysed using the PROCESS macro, testing for parallel mediation. All direct effect hypotheses were corroborated by the analyses. The indirect effect of occupation insecurity on conspiracy views was only significant for political powerlessness, and not for relative deprivation, suggesting political powerlessness to be a more important explanatory variable than relative deprivation. The findings suggest occupation insecurity to have important societal and political correlates. Some suggestions to reduce the negative outcomes of occupation insecurity are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251347770
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is occupation insecurity associated with conspiracy views? A test of parallel mediation through political powerlessness and relative deprivation

Hans De Witte, Anahí Van Hootegem, Lara C. Roll
1 citations
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
article

Is occupation insecurity associated with conspiracy views? A test of parallel mediation through political powerlessness and relative deprivation

Hans De Witte, Anahí Van Hootegem, Lara C. Roll
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We examine the association of a novel form of insecurity (occupation insecurity) with three societal attitudes: the belief in conspiracy views, political powerlessness and relative deprivation. This answers the call in the literature to extend studies on work-related insecurity by broadening its conceptualization and extending its associations with a broader set of outcomes. Next, we explore whether the association between occupation insecurity and conspiracy views is mediated by both societal attitudes: political powerlessness and relative deprivation. The study took place during the Covid crisis in 2020. Consequently, all variables were framed in the context of this crisis. Cross-sectional data gathered via an online survey among 1324 employed wage and salary earners in Flanders (Belgium) are used to test the hypotheses. The data were analysed using the PROCESS macro, testing for parallel mediation. All direct effect hypotheses were corroborated by the analyses. The indirect effect of occupation insecurity on conspiracy views was only significant for political powerlessness, and not for relative deprivation, suggesting political powerlessness to be a more important explanatory variable than relative deprivation. The findings suggest occupation insecurity to have important societal and political correlates. Some suggestions to reduce the negative outcomes of occupation insecurity are discussed.

Economic and Industrial DemocracyVol. 46(3)
University of Canterbury (NZ), North-West University (ZA), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.