Contrasting Biodiversity Monitoring Methods in Two NIPAS Sites in Luzon, Philippines: A Mini-Review

Protected areas under the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) in the Philippines serve as critical habitats for biodiversity conservation. This mini-review compares two biodiversity monitoring approaches used in NIPAS-declared areas of Luzon remote sensing in Mt. Pulag National Park and field-based rapid biodiversity assessment in Bataan National Park. The Mt. Pulag study employed Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to detect forest disturbance, while the Bataan study conducted species-level surveys to document biological richness. The review highlights key differences in data type, scale, and application: remote sensing allows for broad-scale, time-series habitat monitoring, while ground-based surveys offer direct ecological insights but are limited by time and area. The review concludes that combining these approaches can create a more effective and adaptive biodiversity monitoring system, aligned with the objectives of the NIPAS framework. An integrated method linking technology, field data, and local participation will better support conservation decision-making in protected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environment Agriculture and Biotechnology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab.103.27
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting Biodiversity Monitoring Methods in Two NIPAS Sites in Luzon, Philippines: A Mini-Review

Angelo L. Lozano
International Journal of Environment Agriculture and Biotechnology
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
article

Contrasting Biodiversity Monitoring Methods in Two NIPAS Sites in Luzon, Philippines: A Mini-Review

Angelo L. Lozano
article en

Abstract

Protected areas under the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) in the Philippines serve as critical habitats for biodiversity conservation. This mini-review compares two biodiversity monitoring approaches used in NIPAS-declared areas of Luzon remote sensing in Mt. Pulag National Park and field-based rapid biodiversity assessment in Bataan National Park. The Mt. Pulag study employed Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to detect forest disturbance, while the Bataan study conducted species-level surveys to document biological richness. The review highlights key differences in data type, scale, and application: remote sensing allows for broad-scale, time-series habitat monitoring, while ground-based surveys offer direct ecological insights but are limited by time and area. The review concludes that combining these approaches can create a more effective and adaptive biodiversity monitoring system, aligned with the objectives of the NIPAS framework. An integrated method linking technology, field data, and local participation will better support conservation decision-making in protected areas.

International Journal of Environment Agriculture and BiotechnologyVol. 10(3)
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.