Analysis of performance and comparison study of two clinical chemistry auto analyzers using six sigma methodology and quality goal index

Background: Accurate and reliable results in clinical laboratories are essential for effective diagnosis and treatment. This necessitates continuous monitoring and improvement of pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical processes. The Six Sigma methodology, which evaluates total testing error, is a statistical tool for assessing laboratory performance, with sigma values above 6 indicating world-class performance. Additionally, the Quality Goal Index (QGI) helps identify whether performance issues stem from imprecision, inaccuracy, or both. Comparison of methods using regression and Bland-Altman analysis helps ensure consistency between instruments. Aim: To evaluate the performance of routine biochemical tests on two clinical chemistry auto analyzers using Six Sigma metrics and QGI, and to compare results using patient samples. Subjects and MethodsS: This six-month study (May-November 2024) was conducted at the Biochemistry Department of the National Center of Teaching Laboratories and Baghdad Teaching Hospital. Eight analytes (glucose, uric acid, creatinine, urea, cholesterol, triglycerides, ALT, AST) were tested using Abbott Architect c4000 and Beckman Coulter AU480. Sigma metrics and QGI were calculated using internal and external quality control data. A comparison study was conducted per CLSI EP15 guidelines using 20 patient samples. Results: Triglycerides achieved σ > 6 on both analyzers. Uric acid (Abbott) and cholesterol (σ ≈ 6) showed strong performance. Urea showed acceptable performance (σ >3), while glucose, creatinine, ALT, and AST had σ < 3. QGI analysis revealed imprecision and/or inaccuracy issues with specific parameters. Regression and Bland-Altman plots confirmed strong agreement and no significant difference in results between analyzers. Conclusion: Both analyzers demonstrated acceptable performance for several analytes, with comparable results across platforms. However, improvements are required for parameters with lower sigma values.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Pathology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/pathol.2025.v8.i2b.2083
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of performance and comparison study of two clinical chemistry auto analyzers using six sigma methodology and quality goal index

Hashim Hashim, Huda Salim Neama, Anne Khazal Rijub-Agha
International Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Pathology
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

Analysis of performance and comparison study of two clinical chemistry auto analyzers using six sigma methodology and quality goal index

Hashim Hashim, Huda Salim Neama, Anne Khazal Rijub-Agha
article en

Abstract

Background: Accurate and reliable results in clinical laboratories are essential for effective diagnosis and treatment. This necessitates continuous monitoring and improvement of pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical processes. The Six Sigma methodology, which evaluates total testing error, is a statistical tool for assessing laboratory performance, with sigma values above 6 indicating world-class performance. Additionally, the Quality Goal Index (QGI) helps identify whether performance issues stem from imprecision, inaccuracy, or both. Comparison of methods using regression and Bland-Altman analysis helps ensure consistency between instruments. Aim: To evaluate the performance of routine biochemical tests on two clinical chemistry auto analyzers using Six Sigma metrics and QGI, and to compare results using patient samples. Subjects and MethodsS: This six-month study (May-November 2024) was conducted at the Biochemistry Department of the National Center of Teaching Laboratories and Baghdad Teaching Hospital. Eight analytes (glucose, uric acid, creatinine, urea, cholesterol, triglycerides, ALT, AST) were tested using Abbott Architect c4000 and Beckman Coulter AU480. Sigma metrics and QGI were calculated using internal and external quality control data. A comparison study was conducted per CLSI EP15 guidelines using 20 patient samples. Results: Triglycerides achieved σ > 6 on both analyzers. Uric acid (Abbott) and cholesterol (σ ≈ 6) showed strong performance. Urea showed acceptable performance (σ >3), while glucose, creatinine, ALT, and AST had σ < 3. QGI analysis revealed imprecision and/or inaccuracy issues with specific parameters. Regression and Bland-Altman plots confirmed strong agreement and no significant difference in results between analyzers. Conclusion: Both analyzers demonstrated acceptable performance for several analytes, with comparable results across platforms. However, improvements are required for parameters with lower sigma values.

International Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic PathologyVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of performance and comparison study of two clinical chemistry auto analyzers using six sigma methodology and quality goal index — Hashim Hashim, Huda Salim Neama, et al. · International Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Pathology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS