Barbell velocity and its relationship to one-repetition maximum performance in resistance-trained individuals

This study investigated the relationship between barbell velocity at various submaximal intensities and actual one-repetition maximum (1-RM) performance in resistance-trained individuals. The primary aim was to identify which bar velocity metrics best predict maximal strength. Fourteen healthy adults (8 males, 6 females) from the University of South Carolina Aiken participated. Participants completed a 1-RM barbell back squat test in the first session, with a Gymaware FLEX linear position transducer measuring peak and mean concentric velocities. A second session, at least 72 hours later, involved single-repetition back squats at 40-90% of their 1-RM. Results showed significant differences in 1-RM performance based on concentric velocity measures at 60%, 70%, and 80% of 1-RM (p=.003). Eccentric peak velocity at 60% and 70% loads (p=.007), and eccentric mean velocity at 60% load (p=.033) were also significantly associated with 1-RM performance. Linear regression analyses indicated that velocity at 80% load (p<.001), peak velocity at 90% (p=.001), and mean power output at 100% 1-RM (p=.002) were strong predictors of maximal strength. The study concluded that velocity and power variables, especially those measured between 60% and 90% of 1-RM, are significantly related to 1-RM performance and mean power output, supporting the use of submaximal bar velocity to predict maximal strength.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Science and Nutrition
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/27077012.2025.v6.i1b.320
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barbell velocity and its relationship to one-repetition maximum performance in resistance-trained individuals

Matthew Helms, Andrew Hatchett, Trevor Starnes
Journal of Sports Science and Nutrition
Sports Performance and Training
article

Barbell velocity and its relationship to one-repetition maximum performance in resistance-trained individuals

Matthew Helms, Andrew Hatchett, Trevor Starnes
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between barbell velocity at various submaximal intensities and actual one-repetition maximum (1-RM) performance in resistance-trained individuals. The primary aim was to identify which bar velocity metrics best predict maximal strength. Fourteen healthy adults (8 males, 6 females) from the University of South Carolina Aiken participated. Participants completed a 1-RM barbell back squat test in the first session, with a Gymaware FLEX linear position transducer measuring peak and mean concentric velocities. A second session, at least 72 hours later, involved single-repetition back squats at 40-90% of their 1-RM. Results showed significant differences in 1-RM performance based on concentric velocity measures at 60%, 70%, and 80% of 1-RM (p=.003). Eccentric peak velocity at 60% and 70% loads (p=.007), and eccentric mean velocity at 60% load (p=.033) were also significantly associated with 1-RM performance. Linear regression analyses indicated that velocity at 80% load (p<.001), peak velocity at 90% (p=.001), and mean power output at 100% 1-RM (p=.002) were strong predictors of maximal strength. The study concluded that velocity and power variables, especially those measured between 60% and 90% of 1-RM, are significantly related to 1-RM performance and mean power output, supporting the use of submaximal bar velocity to predict maximal strength.

Journal of Sports Science and NutritionVol. 6(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.