The silent giant: China’s inaction on global minimum tax legislation

Abstract The Global Minimum Tax (GMT) has become a focal point in international tax policy, yet China’s response to this development has been notably absent. Despite its political commitment to the GMT, China has yet to take any legislative steps towards its implementation. This article first examines the reasons behind China’s inaction on the GMT legislation from economic, political, and legal perspectives. It finds that the GMT’s limited impact on Chinese tax revenue is the decisive factor. It then explores the strategies that China can adopt in response to the GMT. In the short term, China can continue to adopt a wait-and-see strategy. If it chooses to respond to the GMT, enhancing existing tax laws to mitigate top-up tax revenue loss is a more cost-effective choice than adopting the GMT legislation based on the OECD model. Finally, from a broader perspective, this article reflects on China’s role in global tax governance. As the unilateralism approach of the USA during Donald Trump’s second term poses challenges to the multilateral tax system, China should transform from a silent observer into an active contributor in order to maintain the stability of the multilateral tax system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Economic Law
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaf017
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The silent giant: China’s inaction on global minimum tax legislation

Jingxian Chen
1 citations
Journal of International Economic Law
Taxation and Legal Issues
3.91
article

The silent giant: China’s inaction on global minimum tax legislation

Jingxian Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Global Minimum Tax (GMT) has become a focal point in international tax policy, yet China’s response to this development has been notably absent. Despite its political commitment to the GMT, China has yet to take any legislative steps towards its implementation. This article first examines the reasons behind China’s inaction on the GMT legislation from economic, political, and legal perspectives. It finds that the GMT’s limited impact on Chinese tax revenue is the decisive factor. It then explores the strategies that China can adopt in response to the GMT. In the short term, China can continue to adopt a wait-and-see strategy. If it chooses to respond to the GMT, enhancing existing tax laws to mitigate top-up tax revenue loss is a more cost-effective choice than adopting the GMT legislation based on the OECD model. Finally, from a broader perspective, this article reflects on China’s role in global tax governance. As the unilateralism approach of the USA during Donald Trump’s second term poses challenges to the multilateral tax system, China should transform from a silent observer into an active contributor in order to maintain the stability of the multilateral tax system.

Journal of International Economic LawVol. 28(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Taxation and Legal Issues
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.