Absorptive capacity, adopting change and compliance practice in occupational health and safety

Purpose We study how organisations (that upgrade from baseline standards to advanced standards) use and integrate knowledge to adapt to changes in compliance practices. We explore this problem in the context of occupational health and safety (OH&S) and build on the absorptive capacity (AC) perspective. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a qualitative study and interviewed experts (internal auditors, external auditors, managers from organisations and from conformity assessment bodies) in Australia and New Zealand. The respondents are considered leading experts in the domain and oversee adoption, auditing and certification of OH&S standards. Findings We found that organisational ability to adopt changes in compliance practice is facilitated by standard-specific absorptive capacity (i.e. in our context, capacities directly associated with the OH&S standards). However, standards generic AC (i.e. capacity from other domains) complements and accelerates transformation and exploitation of knowledge during the adoption – moderated by recognition of value related to the standards by organisational leaders. Practical implications Managers need to plan strategically the development of AC related to standards and changes in compliance practice through purposeful development of four components of AC. Originality/value Departing from existing studies, this study is the first study to investigate the transition from baseline to advanced standards – delivering a theoretical model on the effect of AC on the adoption of advanced standards.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Management Decision
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/md-02-2024-0328
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quality and Management Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Absorptive capacity, adopting change and compliance practice in occupational health and safety

Daniel Prajogo, Xiaoli Zhao, Pavel Castka
1 citations
Management Decision
Quality and Management Systems
2.23
article

Absorptive capacity, adopting change and compliance practice in occupational health and safety

Daniel Prajogo, Xiaoli Zhao, Pavel Castka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose We study how organisations (that upgrade from baseline standards to advanced standards) use and integrate knowledge to adapt to changes in compliance practices. We explore this problem in the context of occupational health and safety (OH&S) and build on the absorptive capacity (AC) perspective. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a qualitative study and interviewed experts (internal auditors, external auditors, managers from organisations and from conformity assessment bodies) in Australia and New Zealand. The respondents are considered leading experts in the domain and oversee adoption, auditing and certification of OH&S standards. Findings We found that organisational ability to adopt changes in compliance practice is facilitated by standard-specific absorptive capacity (i.e. in our context, capacities directly associated with the OH&S standards). However, standards generic AC (i.e. capacity from other domains) complements and accelerates transformation and exploitation of knowledge during the adoption – moderated by recognition of value related to the standards by organisational leaders. Practical implications Managers need to plan strategically the development of AC related to standards and changes in compliance practice through purposeful development of four components of AC. Originality/value Departing from existing studies, this study is the first study to investigate the transition from baseline to advanced standards – delivering a theoretical model on the effect of AC on the adoption of advanced standards.

Management Decision
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Quality and Management Systems
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.