DECENTRALIZED FORMS OF LABOR ORGANIZATION IN THE INDUSTRY OF THE MIDDLE VOLGA REGION IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY

The article considers the forms of industrial labor organization in the Middle Volga provinces in the early 20th century, which were not directly related to work in factory enterprises. Although the trend of growing concentration of labor force in the Russian industry was determinant on a macroeconomic scale, the picture was somewhat different at the micro level. In particular, in the industrial provinces of the Middle Volga region in the early 20th century, decentralized forms of labor organization typical for the proto-industrial stage of economic modernization were preserved. First of all, they manifested themselves in the work of distribution offices, which acted as customers for the production of industrial items as well as in the activities of factories and plants, outside of which some production processes and even entire stages of manufacturing of the finished product were taken out. The study revealed that the use of decentralized forms of labor organization in the Russian industry of the early 20th century remained quite a widespread and sustainable practice. In the Middle Volga region it was localized within the framework of the manufacture of felted shoes, tailoring of uniforms for the army (Kazan province), as well as flax spinning (Samara province), cotton (Saratov province), matchmaking (Penza province) and some other industries. The main reasons for the persistence of this phenomenon are the following: the slow pace of depeasantization and the underdevelopment of hired labor market; the possibility of additional profit for entrepreneurs due to cost reduction and minimization of expenditures on fixed capital; a smaller share of responsibility of employers to home-based workers compared to factory workers in accordance with the existing norms of labor legislation, etc.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ural Historical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2025-2(87)-158-167
Primary Topic
Economic, Social, and Public Health Issues in Russia and Globally
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DECENTRALIZED FORMS OF LABOR ORGANIZATION IN THE INDUSTRY OF THE MIDDLE VOLGA REGION IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY

Andrey E. Makushev, Viktor M. Arsentyev
1 links
Ural Historical Journal
Economic, Social, and Public Health Issues in Russia and Globally
article

DECENTRALIZED FORMS OF LABOR ORGANIZATION IN THE INDUSTRY OF THE MIDDLE VOLGA REGION IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY

Andrey E. Makushev, Viktor M. Arsentyev
article en

Abstract

The article considers the forms of industrial labor organization in the Middle Volga provinces in the early 20th century, which were not directly related to work in factory enterprises. Although the trend of growing concentration of labor force in the Russian industry was determinant on a macroeconomic scale, the picture was somewhat different at the micro level. In particular, in the industrial provinces of the Middle Volga region in the early 20th century, decentralized forms of labor organization typical for the proto-industrial stage of economic modernization were preserved. First of all, they manifested themselves in the work of distribution offices, which acted as customers for the production of industrial items as well as in the activities of factories and plants, outside of which some production processes and even entire stages of manufacturing of the finished product were taken out. The study revealed that the use of decentralized forms of labor organization in the Russian industry of the early 20th century remained quite a widespread and sustainable practice. In the Middle Volga region it was localized within the framework of the manufacture of felted shoes, tailoring of uniforms for the army (Kazan province), as well as flax spinning (Samara province), cotton (Saratov province), matchmaking (Penza province) and some other industries. The main reasons for the persistence of this phenomenon are the following: the slow pace of depeasantization and the underdevelopment of hired labor market; the possibility of additional profit for entrepreneurs due to cost reduction and minimization of expenditures on fixed capital; a smaller share of responsibility of employers to home-based workers compared to factory workers in accordance with the existing norms of labor legislation, etc.

Ural Historical JournalVol. 87(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Economic, Social, and Public Health Issues in Russia and Globally
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.