Surfactant-assisted ultrasonic degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effect of surfactant concentration

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants known for their resistance to conventional degradation methods. Ultrasonic degradation, a promising advanced oxidation technique, has emerged as a potential solution for breaking down PFAS in water systems. This study investigates the impact of surfactants on the ultrasonic degradation of various PFAS. Three types of surfactants—dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC, cationic), sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS, anionic), and Triton X-100 (TX-100, non-ionic) were tested to assist the degradation of PFAS such as perfluorooctanoic acid or PFOA, perfluorooctane sulfonate or PFOS, 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate or 6:2 FTS, as well as real-world samples such as aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), and form fractionate (FF) wastes. Ultrasonication with surfactants was tested at around critical micelle concentration (CMC, high concentration range of 0.25–20 mM) and equal molar concentration (low concentration range of ∼0.02 mM) with that of PFAS. Surfactants around CMC did not enhance PFOA, PFOS and 6:2 FTS degradation. Still, they inhibited their degradation, likely due to the competition at the cavity bubble-water interface to shield PFAS from degradation. However, when low concentrations of surfactants were used, particularly at an equal molar concentration with that of PFAS, the degradation was enhanced. The enhancement was also validated for real-world samples of AFFF and FF. The findings provide insights into the interaction between surfactant and PFAS towards the degradation pathway, revealing surfactant-assisted ultrasonic degradation for PFAS remediation. • Addition of DTAC, SDBS and TX-100 at their CMC does not enhance PFAS ultrasonic degradation • Low/Equal molar concentration of PFAS and TX-100 can increase PFAS degradation • Low concentration of surfactant can also enhance ultrasonic degradation of PFAS in AFFF and FF • Scaling up ultrasonic PFAS degradation is demonstrated from 0.25 L to 1 L

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146042
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surfactant-assisted ultrasonic degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effect of surfactant concentration

Ravi Naidu, Olalekan Simon Awoyemi, Cheng Fang
7 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
6.02
article

Surfactant-assisted ultrasonic degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effect of surfactant concentration

Ravi Naidu, Olalekan Simon Awoyemi, Cheng Fang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants known for their resistance to conventional degradation methods. Ultrasonic degradation, a promising advanced oxidation technique, has emerged as a potential solution for breaking down PFAS in water systems. This study investigates the impact of surfactants on the ultrasonic degradation of various PFAS. Three types of surfactants—dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC, cationic), sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS, anionic), and Triton X-100 (TX-100, non-ionic) were tested to assist the degradation of PFAS such as perfluorooctanoic acid or PFOA, perfluorooctane sulfonate or PFOS, 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate or 6:2 FTS, as well as real-world samples such as aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), and form fractionate (FF) wastes. Ultrasonication with surfactants was tested at around critical micelle concentration (CMC, high concentration range of 0.25–20 mM) and equal molar concentration (low concentration range of ∼0.02 mM) with that of PFAS. Surfactants around CMC did not enhance PFOA, PFOS and 6:2 FTS degradation. Still, they inhibited their degradation, likely due to the competition at the cavity bubble-water interface to shield PFAS from degradation. However, when low concentrations of surfactants were used, particularly at an equal molar concentration with that of PFAS, the degradation was enhanced. The enhancement was also validated for real-world samples of AFFF and FF. The findings provide insights into the interaction between surfactant and PFAS towards the degradation pathway, revealing surfactant-assisted ultrasonic degradation for PFAS remediation. • Addition of DTAC, SDBS and TX-100 at their CMC does not enhance PFAS ultrasonic degradation • Low/Equal molar concentration of PFAS and TX-100 can increase PFAS degradation • Low concentration of surfactant can also enhance ultrasonic degradation of PFAS in AFFF and FF • Scaling up ultrasonic PFAS degradation is demonstrated from 0.25 L to 1 L

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 519
CRC CARE (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment, University of Newcastle Australia, Australian Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.