The Crusader Kingdoms, an Archival Crossroads

The retrieval of an Arabic notary deed produced in Cyprus in 1435 triggers this inquiry into the overlapping scribal systems under the Crusaders. Some actors and institutions, such as the Genoese and Venetian notaries operating on the island, conspired to form archival collections. Yet the article discusses the Crusaders’ reluctant attitudes toward writing and archiving their own laws and the myths around old archives and their destruction that arose in the literature. The practice of Frankish chanceries, populated mainly by Syrians, and that of Arabic scribes and their Islamic-like notarial system did not derive into the formation of archives. These actors, it is argued, followed an archival logic that had much in common with their Islamic counterparts. In light of the Crusader archival paradox, the article reconsiders recent literature dealing with chancery practices, the materiality of documents, and the lack of archives in Medieval Islam.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Qanṭara
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3989/alqantara.2024.700
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Crusader Kingdoms, an Archival Crossroads

Francisco Apellániz
Al-Qanṭara
Byzantine Studies and History
article

The Crusader Kingdoms, an Archival Crossroads

Francisco Apellániz
article en

Abstract

The retrieval of an Arabic notary deed produced in Cyprus in 1435 triggers this inquiry into the overlapping scribal systems under the Crusaders. Some actors and institutions, such as the Genoese and Venetian notaries operating on the island, conspired to form archival collections. Yet the article discusses the Crusaders’ reluctant attitudes toward writing and archiving their own laws and the myths around old archives and their destruction that arose in the literature. The practice of Frankish chanceries, populated mainly by Syrians, and that of Arabic scribes and their Islamic-like notarial system did not derive into the formation of archives. These actors, it is argued, followed an archival logic that had much in common with their Islamic counterparts. In light of the Crusader archival paradox, the article reconsiders recent literature dealing with chancery practices, the materiality of documents, and the lack of archives in Medieval Islam.

Al-QanṭaraVol. 45(2)
University of Naples - L'Orientale (IT)
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.