Natural Sciences in the BNCC: an analysis focused on the domains of scientific knowledge

Abstract Grounded in the understanding of science as a social practice, this study examines how scientific concepts are framed within the essential learning outlined in Brazil’s National Common Curricular Base (BNCC) for Natural Sciences. Our analysis focuses on the characterization of these concepts and their connections to the four domains of scientific knowledge: conceptual, epistemic, social, and material. In the elementary school curriculum, we find a predominance of the conceptual domain, while the material and epistemic domains are less frequently addressed. The social domain is entirely absent, and there is a scarcity of connections between these domains. Although the high school curriculum exhibits a greater degree of articulation, the social domain remains absent. As a result, we highlight the challenges faced by students and emphasize the need for teachers to view scientific practices not merely as content but as critical activities to be undertaken in the classroom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pro-Posições
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-6248-2024-0060en
Primary Topic
Science and Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Natural Sciences in the BNCC: an analysis focused on the domains of scientific knowledge

Fernando César Silva, Lúcia Helena Sasseron, Luciana de Abreu Nascimento
1 links
Pro-Posições
Science and Science Education
article

Natural Sciences in the BNCC: an analysis focused on the domains of scientific knowledge

Fernando César Silva, Lúcia Helena Sasseron, Luciana de Abreu Nascimento
article en

Abstract

Abstract Grounded in the understanding of science as a social practice, this study examines how scientific concepts are framed within the essential learning outlined in Brazil’s National Common Curricular Base (BNCC) for Natural Sciences. Our analysis focuses on the characterization of these concepts and their connections to the four domains of scientific knowledge: conceptual, epistemic, social, and material. In the elementary school curriculum, we find a predominance of the conceptual domain, while the material and epistemic domains are less frequently addressed. The social domain is entirely absent, and there is a scarcity of connections between these domains. Although the high school curriculum exhibits a greater degree of articulation, the social domain remains absent. As a result, we highlight the challenges faced by students and emphasize the need for teachers to view scientific practices not merely as content but as critical activities to be undertaken in the classroom.

Pro-PosiçõesVol. 36
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Brasil (BR), Instituto Federal do Sul de Minas (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Science and Science Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.