A Summary of U.S. Watershed Precipitation Forecast Skill and the National Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations Expansion Pathfinder Effort

Abstract Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO) seeks to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of reservoir operations by leveraging reliable and skillful meteorological and hydrological forecasts to inform water management decisions. FIRO aims to provide increased operational flexibility to optimize competing resource objectives within a catchment area, its reservoir, and regions downstream. While there are many physical, hydrological, environmental, and engineering considerations that make FIRO potentially viable versus impractical at any given reservoir and dam, the potential success of FIRO nationwide relies fundamentally on quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) and streamflow forecast skill from numerical weather prediction and/or operational forecast guidance. This study demonstrates that western U.S. watersheds in California, Oregon, and Washington exhibit on average the highest QPF skill based on the critical success index (CSI) for extreme watershed precipitation days (quantified by mean areal precipitation values above the top 1% of wet days locally). Watersheds in New England and the mid-Atlantic exhibit similarly high QPF skill but reveal a more rapid decrease in skill as lead times increase. The national variability in QPF skill is reflected within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) portfolio of dams with highest watershed QPF skill for sites within the Sacramento, Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Wilmington, Charleston, Baltimore, and New England Districts, among others. The results of this study motivate further national QPF skill analyses as part of the “FIRO Phase III: National Expansion Pathfinder” effort to develop and apply a FIRO screening process nationally across the USACE portfolio of dams. Significance Statement The viability of Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO) at a given reservoir relies in part on precipitation and streamflow forecast skill. This study illustrates the spatial characteristics of precipitation forecast skill for watersheds across the United States and summarizes the results by the hydrologic region and for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) districts in support of FIRO Phase III: the National Expansion Pathfinder effort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather and Forecasting
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-24-0188.1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Summary of U.S. Watershed Precipitation Forecast Skill and the National Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations Expansion Pathfinder Effort

Fred Martin Ralph, David Novák, Emily Slinskey, James A. Nelson et al.
2 citations
Weather and Forecasting
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
article

A Summary of U.S. Watershed Precipitation Forecast Skill and the National Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations Expansion Pathfinder Effort

Fred Martin Ralph, David Novák, Emily Slinskey, James A. Nelson, Kelly Mahoney, Luca Delle Monache, Joe Forbis, Jason M. Cordeira, Rachel Weihs, Cary A. Talbot
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO) seeks to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of reservoir operations by leveraging reliable and skillful meteorological and hydrological forecasts to inform water management decisions. FIRO aims to provide increased operational flexibility to optimize competing resource objectives within a catchment area, its reservoir, and regions downstream. While there are many physical, hydrological, environmental, and engineering considerations that make FIRO potentially viable versus impractical at any given reservoir and dam, the potential success of FIRO nationwide relies fundamentally on quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) and streamflow forecast skill from numerical weather prediction and/or operational forecast guidance. This study demonstrates that western U.S. watersheds in California, Oregon, and Washington exhibit on average the highest QPF skill based on the critical success index (CSI) for extreme watershed precipitation days (quantified by mean areal precipitation values above the top 1% of wet days locally). Watersheds in New England and the mid-Atlantic exhibit similarly high QPF skill but reveal a more rapid decrease in skill as lead times increase. The national variability in QPF skill is reflected within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) portfolio of dams with highest watershed QPF skill for sites within the Sacramento, Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Wilmington, Charleston, Baltimore, and New England Districts, among others. The results of this study motivate further national QPF skill analyses as part of the “FIRO Phase III: National Expansion Pathfinder” effort to develop and apply a FIRO screening process nationally across the USACE portfolio of dams. Significance Statement The viability of Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO) at a given reservoir relies in part on precipitation and streamflow forecast skill. This study illustrates the spatial characteristics of precipitation forecast skill for watersheds across the United States and summarizes the results by the hydrologic region and for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) districts in support of FIRO Phase III: the National Expansion Pathfinder effort.

Weather and ForecastingVol. 40(8)
United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (US), NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (US)
Department of Water Resources, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.