DS27 Checking blood pressure of patients having Mohs surgery: a survey of practice of UK- and Australasia-based Mohs surgeons

Abstract Mohs surgeons’ approach to preoperative hypertension appears to vary and may lead to cancelled lists (personal communication), as some consider hypertension a contributory risk factor for bleeding and haematoma. We sought to obtain formal opinion via a survey of Mohs surgeons. In December 2024, a brief six-question e-survey was circulated to all 103 registered UK-based Mohs surgeons (British Society for Dermatological Surgery) and the 77 Mohs surgeons based in Australasia (Australia and New Zealand: ANZ) via the Australasian College of Dermatologists. The response rates were 50% (52 of 103) and 26% (20 of 77), respectively. Based on branching logic survey methodology, the third question was linked to three further questions. In total, 24 UK respondents had performed Mohs for < 10 years (11 in ANZ), 19 respondents for 10–19 years (eight in ANZ) and nine for > 20 years (one respondent in ANZ). Overall, 63% of UK-based and 60% of ANZ-based respondents believed ‘that hypertension during Mohs surgery contributes to bleeding’. In total, 19% of UK-based and 10% of ANZ-based respondents ‘did not know if hypertension causes increased bleeding’. Only 37% of UK-based respondents check blood pressure on the day of Mohs surgery, compared with 80% of Australasian respondents. The cutoff for abnormally high blood pressure (BP) in the context of Mohs respondents was as follows: 140/90 mmHg (UK 3%, ANZ 0%), 160/100 mmHg (UK 15%, ANZ 24%), 180/100 mmHg (UK 36%, ANZ 35%) and 200/100 mmHg (UK 45%, ANZ 41%). The answers to question 5 were diverse: ‘If you felt BP was high, what would you do?’. Responses were ‘postpone starting Mohs and re-check BP reading after a period of rest’ (UK 37%, ANZ 19%), ‘prescribe a single dose of anti-hypertensive then proceed with Mohs (UK 5%, ANZ 19%) and ‘BP noted but no treatment given and proceed with Mohs (UK 37%, ANZ 38%). ‘Other’ open comment themes included determining signs of malignant hypertension, checking what their baseline BP was with the patient and/or general practitioner, refer to an emergency department or give a benzodiazepine (e.g. low-dose sublingual diazepam 2 mg). The decision was influenced by the Mohs surgeon’s preference and site of the surgery. There was a wide range of opinions with different thresholds for medical treatment and choice of antihypertensive for each Mohs surgeon. Some surgeons would operate at 180/100 mmHg. From ANZ, glyceryl trinitrate, ramipril and sublingual nifedipine were given as antihypertensives. However, felodipine was commonly used in the UK. The results confirm a range of practice and no consensus. Further discussion and an evidence-based guideline would be helpful to develop more consistent practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf085.321
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DS27 Checking blood pressure of patients having Mohs surgery: a survey of practice of UK- and Australasia-based Mohs surgeons

Lorna Hay, Faisal Dubash, Eugene Tan, Andrew Affleck
British Journal of Dermatology
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

DS27 Checking blood pressure of patients having Mohs surgery: a survey of practice of UK- and Australasia-based Mohs surgeons

Lorna Hay, Faisal Dubash, Eugene Tan, Andrew Affleck
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mohs surgeons’ approach to preoperative hypertension appears to vary and may lead to cancelled lists (personal communication), as some consider hypertension a contributory risk factor for bleeding and haematoma. We sought to obtain formal opinion via a survey of Mohs surgeons. In December 2024, a brief six-question e-survey was circulated to all 103 registered UK-based Mohs surgeons (British Society for Dermatological Surgery) and the 77 Mohs surgeons based in Australasia (Australia and New Zealand: ANZ) via the Australasian College of Dermatologists. The response rates were 50% (52 of 103) and 26% (20 of 77), respectively. Based on branching logic survey methodology, the third question was linked to three further questions. In total, 24 UK respondents had performed Mohs for < 10 years (11 in ANZ), 19 respondents for 10–19 years (eight in ANZ) and nine for > 20 years (one respondent in ANZ). Overall, 63% of UK-based and 60% of ANZ-based respondents believed ‘that hypertension during Mohs surgery contributes to bleeding’. In total, 19% of UK-based and 10% of ANZ-based respondents ‘did not know if hypertension causes increased bleeding’. Only 37% of UK-based respondents check blood pressure on the day of Mohs surgery, compared with 80% of Australasian respondents. The cutoff for abnormally high blood pressure (BP) in the context of Mohs respondents was as follows: 140/90 mmHg (UK 3%, ANZ 0%), 160/100 mmHg (UK 15%, ANZ 24%), 180/100 mmHg (UK 36%, ANZ 35%) and 200/100 mmHg (UK 45%, ANZ 41%). The answers to question 5 were diverse: ‘If you felt BP was high, what would you do?’. Responses were ‘postpone starting Mohs and re-check BP reading after a period of rest’ (UK 37%, ANZ 19%), ‘prescribe a single dose of anti-hypertensive then proceed with Mohs (UK 5%, ANZ 19%) and ‘BP noted but no treatment given and proceed with Mohs (UK 37%, ANZ 38%). ‘Other’ open comment themes included determining signs of malignant hypertension, checking what their baseline BP was with the patient and/or general practitioner, refer to an emergency department or give a benzodiazepine (e.g. low-dose sublingual diazepam 2 mg). The decision was influenced by the Mohs surgeon’s preference and site of the surgery. There was a wide range of opinions with different thresholds for medical treatment and choice of antihypertensive for each Mohs surgeon. Some surgeons would operate at 180/100 mmHg. From ANZ, glyceryl trinitrate, ramipril and sublingual nifedipine were given as antihypertensives. However, felodipine was commonly used in the UK. The results confirm a range of practice and no consensus. Further discussion and an evidence-based guideline would be helpful to develop more consistent practice.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 193(Supplement_1)
Ninewells Hospital (GB), St Vincent's Clinic (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.