P085 Prescribing practices among psoriasis experts for patients with concomitant malignancy: a survey of international psoriasis council members

Abstract The management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients with concurrent or previous malignancy presents a unique clinical challenge. Despite the transformative impact of biologic therapies on psoriasis treatment, the exclusion of patients with malignancy from clinical trials has led to a paucity of data regarding the safety and efficacy of systemic and biologic agents in this subgroup. Clinicians are thus often compelled to rely on registry data, real-world evidence and expert opinion when navigating these complex cases. Our objective was to investigate prescribing practices among psoriasis experts for systemic and biologic therapies in patients with severe psoriasis and concomitant malignancy. The study aimed to elucidate trends in decision making, perceptions of treatment risks, and adherence to multidisciplinary approaches. An electronic survey was disseminated to 141 members of the International Psoriasis Council (IPC) between December 2023 and June 2024. The self-administered questionnaire examined respondents’ demographics, guideline familiarity and preferences for systemic and biologic therapies across five malignancy types (breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer, lymphoma, and metastatic renal cell carcinoma) at varying remission intervals. Data were analysed descriptively. Fifty-seven IPC councillors completed the survey (40%). Anti-interleukin-17 agents were the most commonly selected therapies across all malignancy scenarios for patients in remission, reflecting growing confidence in their safety profiles. For active malignancies, apremilast was the most frequently chosen agent, particularly for breast cancer (61%), melanoma (56%) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (49%). Tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors and fumaric acid esters were the least frequently selected treatments for active malignancies. The majority of respondents (70%) believed current guidelines lacked clarity on treating psoriasis in the context of malignancy. Nearly half (49%) reported always consulting oncology teams before initiating systemic therapy for patients with recent malignancy diagnoses, underscoring the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. This study highlights significant variability in prescribing practices and a strong preference for biologics such as anti-interleukin-17 agents and apremilast. The findings underscore the urgent need for malignancy-specific guidelines informed by robust long-term safety data to support optimal decision making and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf085.113
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P085 Prescribing practices among psoriasis experts for patients with concomitant malignancy: a survey of international psoriasis council members

Caitriona Ryan, Michelle Murphy, Stephanie Bowe, John Bourke
British Journal of Dermatology
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
article

P085 Prescribing practices among psoriasis experts for patients with concomitant malignancy: a survey of international psoriasis council members

Caitriona Ryan, Michelle Murphy, Stephanie Bowe, John Bourke
article en

Abstract

Abstract The management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients with concurrent or previous malignancy presents a unique clinical challenge. Despite the transformative impact of biologic therapies on psoriasis treatment, the exclusion of patients with malignancy from clinical trials has led to a paucity of data regarding the safety and efficacy of systemic and biologic agents in this subgroup. Clinicians are thus often compelled to rely on registry data, real-world evidence and expert opinion when navigating these complex cases. Our objective was to investigate prescribing practices among psoriasis experts for systemic and biologic therapies in patients with severe psoriasis and concomitant malignancy. The study aimed to elucidate trends in decision making, perceptions of treatment risks, and adherence to multidisciplinary approaches. An electronic survey was disseminated to 141 members of the International Psoriasis Council (IPC) between December 2023 and June 2024. The self-administered questionnaire examined respondents’ demographics, guideline familiarity and preferences for systemic and biologic therapies across five malignancy types (breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer, lymphoma, and metastatic renal cell carcinoma) at varying remission intervals. Data were analysed descriptively. Fifty-seven IPC councillors completed the survey (40%). Anti-interleukin-17 agents were the most commonly selected therapies across all malignancy scenarios for patients in remission, reflecting growing confidence in their safety profiles. For active malignancies, apremilast was the most frequently chosen agent, particularly for breast cancer (61%), melanoma (56%) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (49%). Tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors and fumaric acid esters were the least frequently selected treatments for active malignancies. The majority of respondents (70%) believed current guidelines lacked clarity on treating psoriasis in the context of malignancy. Nearly half (49%) reported always consulting oncology teams before initiating systemic therapy for patients with recent malignancy diagnoses, underscoring the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. This study highlights significant variability in prescribing practices and a strong preference for biologics such as anti-interleukin-17 agents and apremilast. The findings underscore the urgent need for malignancy-specific guidelines informed by robust long-term safety data to support optimal decision making and improve patient outcomes.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 193(Supplement_1)
South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.