DE01 (P055) Key components of high-quality distance learning in specialist dermatology: a Delphi consensus study

Abstract The global surge in distance learning (DL) across medical education has prompted significant advancements in online teaching methodologies. However, a paucity of research exists concerning the essential components required for high-quality DL in specialist dermatology. This study aims to identify the key components of a successful DL programme for postgraduate education in dermatology through expert consensus. A Delphi methodology was employed to gather consensus from 11 dermatology education experts across the UK. This included initial expert semistructured interviews, which generated 39 Delphi propositions, followed by norming and iterative rounds of Delphi surveys, delivered via a validated online platform. Respondents rated the desirability and feasibility of 39 generated propositions, using a seven-point Likert scale. These encompassed programme structure, content, delivery and assessment in DL. Consensus was achieved on 21 (54%) of the 39 propositions. Key components identified include a modular structure, credit-based system, multidevice access and predominantly asynchronous delivery with some synchronous live sessions. Formative assessment was preferred over summative assessment, with minimal endorsement of proctoring or live patient assessments. Cross-cultural considerations, although important, were not seen as significant barriers to unified curriculum delivery. Clinical case histories, procedural videos and click-through modular content were the highest-rated teaching modalities or tools. In conclusion, this study offers the first consensus-driven framework to create high-quality DL programmes in specialist dermatology. The findings highlight the importance of structuring content to facilitate asynchronous learning, integrating varied teaching tools and emphasizing formative assessments. These insights will inform future DL programme designs in dermatology and have broader applications for specialist medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf085.446
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DE01 (P055) Key components of high-quality distance learning in specialist dermatology: a Delphi consensus study

Simon Rae-Scott, Amr Salam, David Streatfield, Sharon Markless et al.
British Journal of Dermatology
Healthcare Systems and Technology
article

DE01 (P055) Key components of high-quality distance learning in specialist dermatology: a Delphi consensus study

Simon Rae-Scott, Amr Salam, David Streatfield, Sharon Markless, Fatima Zohra El Ali, Yusera El-Sockary
article en

Abstract

Abstract The global surge in distance learning (DL) across medical education has prompted significant advancements in online teaching methodologies. However, a paucity of research exists concerning the essential components required for high-quality DL in specialist dermatology. This study aims to identify the key components of a successful DL programme for postgraduate education in dermatology through expert consensus. A Delphi methodology was employed to gather consensus from 11 dermatology education experts across the UK. This included initial expert semistructured interviews, which generated 39 Delphi propositions, followed by norming and iterative rounds of Delphi surveys, delivered via a validated online platform. Respondents rated the desirability and feasibility of 39 generated propositions, using a seven-point Likert scale. These encompassed programme structure, content, delivery and assessment in DL. Consensus was achieved on 21 (54%) of the 39 propositions. Key components identified include a modular structure, credit-based system, multidevice access and predominantly asynchronous delivery with some synchronous live sessions. Formative assessment was preferred over summative assessment, with minimal endorsement of proctoring or live patient assessments. Cross-cultural considerations, although important, were not seen as significant barriers to unified curriculum delivery. Clinical case histories, procedural videos and click-through modular content were the highest-rated teaching modalities or tools. In conclusion, this study offers the first consensus-driven framework to create high-quality DL programmes in specialist dermatology. The findings highlight the importance of structuring content to facilitate asynchronous learning, integrating varied teaching tools and emphasizing formative assessments. These insights will inform future DL programme designs in dermatology and have broader applications for specialist medical education.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 193(Supplement_1)
King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Connect (NO), King's College Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Healthcare Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.