P122 Conducting federated treatment effectiveness analyses for systemic therapies in atopic dermatitis across country borders: methodological considerations from the DREAM TO TREAT AD project

Abstract There is a lack of evidence on treatment outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the context of regular healthcare provision. While registers are a valuable tool for data collection in the context of regular care, treatment outcomes may not always be collected on the visit dates predetermined by the study protocol. Therefore, time windows around those dates have to be defined for statistical analyses. In addition, uptake on some systemic therapies is gradual, resulting in relatively small numbers of patients in some country registers. The DREAM TO TREAT AD (D2T AD) project is a European register-based study of abrocitinib and conventional systemic therapies in AD. It aims to develop and validate a federated statistical analysis methodology to evaluate treatment effectiveness across national AD registers. The D2T AD consortium consists of A-STAR Ireland, A-STAR UK, SCRATCH Denmark, TREATgermany and TREAT NL/Belgium. The federated analysis of treatment outcomes is conducted from patient enrolment through the follow-up period using the secure DataSHIELD environment. Outcomes recorded include Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), (Children’s) Dermatology Life Quality Index [(C)DLQI], Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM),and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rate Scale (PP-NRS). This consists of individual register data nodes and an analytical hub. To evaluate the treatment effectiveness of abrocitinib and conventional systemic therapies in DataSHIELD, changes in EASI, POEM, (C)DLQI and PP-NRS scores between treatment initiation (baseline) and follow-up timepoints (from week 16 until 3 years) are assessed using a linear regression model with adjustment for the baseline outcome score. The data structure includes two outcome values paired with distance in days collected to each visit date – one before and one after – at treatment initiation and every planned follow-up visit. It is possible to select different time windows at the analysis stage in the DataSHIELD environment and produce statistical results depending on the data included in the selected time windows. This approach allows for the analysis to be done without creating several datasets for each specific time window to assign a treatment outcome. The methodology has been validated using synthetic data in the DataSHIELD environment to evaluate achievement of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and ≥ 90% improvement in EASI score at week 16 from baseline. A novel federated statistical analysis approach for evaluating treatment effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with abrocitinib and conventional systemic treatments has been developed and validated using synthetic data. As a next step, the analysis will be applied across the D2T AD consortium registers to generate valuable effectiveness results including sensitivity analyses regarding choice of visit windows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf085.150
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P122 Conducting federated treatment effectiveness analyses for systemic therapies in atopic dermatitis across country borders: methodological considerations from the DREAM TO TREAT AD project

David Prieto‐Merino, Niels Steen Krogh, Ahmet Akkoç, Simon Francis Thomsen et al.
British Journal of Dermatology
Delphi Technique in Research
article

P122 Conducting federated treatment effectiveness analyses for systemic therapies in atopic dermatitis across country borders: methodological considerations from the DREAM TO TREAT AD project

David Prieto‐Merino, Niels Steen Krogh, Ahmet Akkoç, Simon Francis Thomsen, Brian B. Farrell, Carsten Flohr, Louise A. A. Gerbens, Maria Oberländer Christensen, Abaigeal Jackson, Thomas Werfel, Axel Hertzschuch, Erman Güler, Lara Cutlar, Bolaji Coker, Jochen Schmitt, Phyllis I. Spuls, Alan D. Irvine, Thomas Birkner, Con Hennessy, Stephan Weidinger, Elizaveta Gribaleva, Anne Grete Frostrup, Benoit Raymond
article en

Abstract

Abstract There is a lack of evidence on treatment outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the context of regular healthcare provision. While registers are a valuable tool for data collection in the context of regular care, treatment outcomes may not always be collected on the visit dates predetermined by the study protocol. Therefore, time windows around those dates have to be defined for statistical analyses. In addition, uptake on some systemic therapies is gradual, resulting in relatively small numbers of patients in some country registers. The DREAM TO TREAT AD (D2T AD) project is a European register-based study of abrocitinib and conventional systemic therapies in AD. It aims to develop and validate a federated statistical analysis methodology to evaluate treatment effectiveness across national AD registers. The D2T AD consortium consists of A-STAR Ireland, A-STAR UK, SCRATCH Denmark, TREATgermany and TREAT NL/Belgium. The federated analysis of treatment outcomes is conducted from patient enrolment through the follow-up period using the secure DataSHIELD environment. Outcomes recorded include Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), (Children’s) Dermatology Life Quality Index [(C)DLQI], Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM),and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rate Scale (PP-NRS). This consists of individual register data nodes and an analytical hub. To evaluate the treatment effectiveness of abrocitinib and conventional systemic therapies in DataSHIELD, changes in EASI, POEM, (C)DLQI and PP-NRS scores between treatment initiation (baseline) and follow-up timepoints (from week 16 until 3 years) are assessed using a linear regression model with adjustment for the baseline outcome score. The data structure includes two outcome values paired with distance in days collected to each visit date – one before and one after – at treatment initiation and every planned follow-up visit. It is possible to select different time windows at the analysis stage in the DataSHIELD environment and produce statistical results depending on the data included in the selected time windows. This approach allows for the analysis to be done without creating several datasets for each specific time window to assign a treatment outcome. The methodology has been validated using synthetic data in the DataSHIELD environment to evaluate achievement of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and ≥ 90% improvement in EASI score at week 16 from baseline. A novel federated statistical analysis approach for evaluating treatment effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with abrocitinib and conventional systemic treatments has been developed and validated using synthetic data. As a next step, the analysis will be applied across the D2T AD consortium registers to generate valuable effectiveness results including sensitivity analyses regarding choice of visit windows.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 193(Supplement_1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Synlab Czech (Czechia) (CZ), Pfizer (United States) (US), King's College London (GB), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Bispebjerg Hospital (DK), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Vhi Healthcare (IE), Institute of Dermatology (TH), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Pfizer (Ireland) (IE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Lübeck (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.