Survival Analysis Using Neoadjuvant Rectal Score in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Who Underwent Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: An Ambispective Study

Purpose The purpose of this study is to stratify patients into various risk groups based on their neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and study the predictive value of the NAR score in terms of oncological outcomes. This, in turn, can be used as a surrogate marker to prognosticate the patients and also to study the efficacy of various neoadjuvant therapeutic options. Methodology This ambispective observational study of patients who underwent long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT), followed by curative surgery in the form of anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR), from 2010 to 2015 at a high-volume tertiary cancer center in South Kerala, with the survival data collected prospectively. The clinicopathological details of the patients were obtained. ypTNM status was recorded, and the NAR score was calculated. The patients were prospectively followed up for recurrence or death. All endpoints were calculated from the date of the start of NACTRT. Results Four hundred fifty-nine patients were included in the study, with 190 (41.4%) being women and 202 (44%) being less than 60 years old. Two hundred fourteen (46.62%) had lesions of 5-10 cm from the anal verge. Three hundred fifty-nine (78.21%) patients had T3 disease pre-NACTRT. Two hundred twenty-eight patients (51.85%) had undergone APR, and 369 (80.4%) had open surgery. Fifty-one patients (11.1%) had attained pathological complete response (PCR). One hundred twenty-eight patients (27.8%) had disease recurrence, of which 71 had distant metastasis. NAR was a significant predictor of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI), and locoregional relapse-free interval (LRFI). On the multivariate analysis of factors predicting survival, only NAR was found to be significant. Conclusion The NAR score is a significant predictor of OS, DFS, LRFI, and DMFI and can be used as a short-term surrogate for survival data in anticipated trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.86859
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival Analysis Using Neoadjuvant Rectal Score in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Who Underwent Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: An Ambispective Study

C D Sivanandan, Kurian Cherian, Madhu Muralee, Paul Augustine et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
1.05
article

Survival Analysis Using Neoadjuvant Rectal Score in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Who Underwent Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: An Ambispective Study

C D Sivanandan, Kurian Cherian, Madhu Muralee, Paul Augustine, Mira Wagh Sudham, Arun Peter, K Chandramohan, Akhil Thomas Jacob
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to stratify patients into various risk groups based on their neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and study the predictive value of the NAR score in terms of oncological outcomes. This, in turn, can be used as a surrogate marker to prognosticate the patients and also to study the efficacy of various neoadjuvant therapeutic options. Methodology This ambispective observational study of patients who underwent long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT), followed by curative surgery in the form of anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR), from 2010 to 2015 at a high-volume tertiary cancer center in South Kerala, with the survival data collected prospectively. The clinicopathological details of the patients were obtained. ypTNM status was recorded, and the NAR score was calculated. The patients were prospectively followed up for recurrence or death. All endpoints were calculated from the date of the start of NACTRT. Results Four hundred fifty-nine patients were included in the study, with 190 (41.4%) being women and 202 (44%) being less than 60 years old. Two hundred fourteen (46.62%) had lesions of 5-10 cm from the anal verge. Three hundred fifty-nine (78.21%) patients had T3 disease pre-NACTRT. Two hundred twenty-eight patients (51.85%) had undergone APR, and 369 (80.4%) had open surgery. Fifty-one patients (11.1%) had attained pathological complete response (PCR). One hundred twenty-eight patients (27.8%) had disease recurrence, of which 71 had distant metastasis. NAR was a significant predictor of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI), and locoregional relapse-free interval (LRFI). On the multivariate analysis of factors predicting survival, only NAR was found to be significant. Conclusion The NAR score is a significant predictor of OS, DFS, LRFI, and DMFI and can be used as a short-term surrogate for survival data in anticipated trials.

CureusVol. 17(6)
Regional Cancer Center, Thiruvananthapuram (IN), General Hospital Ernakulam (IN), National Cancer Centre Japan (JP), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.