Human attention-guided visual perception is governed by rhythmic oscillations and aperiodic timescales

Attention samples visual space sequentially to enhance behaviorally relevant sensory representations. While traditionally conceptualized as a static continuous spotlight, contemporary models of attention highlight its discrete nature. But which neural mechanisms govern the temporally precise allocation of attention? Periodic brain activity as exemplified by neuronal oscillations as well as aperiodic temporal structure in the form of intrinsic neural timescales have been proposed to orchestrate the attentional sampling process in space and time. However, both mechanisms have been largely studied in isolation. To date, it remains unclear whether periodic and aperiodic temporal structure reflect distinct neural mechanisms. Here, we combined computational simulations with a multimodal approach encompassing five experiments, and three different variants of classic spatial attention paradigms, to differentiate aperiodic from oscillatory-based sampling. Converging evidence across behavior as well as scalp and intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) revealed that periodic and aperiodic temporal regularities can theoretically and experimentally be distinguished. Our results extend the rhythmic sampling framework of attention by demonstrating that aperiodic neural timescales predict behavior in a spatially-, context-, and demand-dependent manner. Aperiodic timescales increased from sensory to association cortex, decreased during sensory processing or action execution, and were prolonged with increasing behavioral demands. These results reveal that multiple, concurrent temporal regularities govern attentional sampling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Biology
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003232
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human attention-guided visual perception is governed by rhythmic oscillations and aperiodic timescales

Jack J. Lin, Assaf Breska, Sabine Kästner, Ian C. Fiebelkorn et al.
5 citations
PLoS Biology
Neural dynamics and brain function
7.16
article

Human attention-guided visual perception is governed by rhythmic oscillations and aperiodic timescales

Jack J. Lin, Assaf Breska, Sabine Kästner, Ian C. Fiebelkorn, Robert T. Knight, Randolph F. Helfrich, Josef Parvizi, Isabel Raposo
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Attention samples visual space sequentially to enhance behaviorally relevant sensory representations. While traditionally conceptualized as a static continuous spotlight, contemporary models of attention highlight its discrete nature. But which neural mechanisms govern the temporally precise allocation of attention? Periodic brain activity as exemplified by neuronal oscillations as well as aperiodic temporal structure in the form of intrinsic neural timescales have been proposed to orchestrate the attentional sampling process in space and time. However, both mechanisms have been largely studied in isolation. To date, it remains unclear whether periodic and aperiodic temporal structure reflect distinct neural mechanisms. Here, we combined computational simulations with a multimodal approach encompassing five experiments, and three different variants of classic spatial attention paradigms, to differentiate aperiodic from oscillatory-based sampling. Converging evidence across behavior as well as scalp and intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) revealed that periodic and aperiodic temporal regularities can theoretically and experimentally be distinguished. Our results extend the rhythmic sampling framework of attention by demonstrating that aperiodic neural timescales predict behavior in a spatially-, context-, and demand-dependent manner. Aperiodic timescales increased from sensory to association cortex, decreased during sensory processing or action execution, and were prolonged with increasing behavioral demands. These results reveal that multiple, concurrent temporal regularities govern attentional sampling.

PLoS BiologyVol. 23(6)
Neurosciences Institute (US), Princeton University (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE), Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE), Neurological Surgery (US), University of Tübingen (DE), University of California, Davis (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, Baden-Württemberg Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Gemeinnützige Hertie-Stiftung, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Neural dynamics and brain function
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.