Managing cultural heritage as a component of local-level sustainable development

In the current context of advancing sustainable development at the local level, cultural heritage is gaining recognition as an endogenous resource that contributes to shaping the identity of territorial communities, strengthening social capital, and stimulating economic activity. Despite its significant potential, the mechanisms for integrating heritage into strategic community development planning remain fragmented. The purpose of this article is to substantiate the role of cultural heritage as an instrument for ensuring sustainable development in territorial communities and to explore models for incorporating heritage into local policy frameworks. The methodological basis of the study includes a systems approach, analysis of legal and regulatory acts, local development strategies, scientific literature, and international practices. Comparative analysis methods were applied to evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches to heritage programming. The study classifies types of cultural heritage and characterizes their influence on the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. It identifies three models for integrating heritage into local development strategies: as a mandatory heritage protection program; as an embedded component of the general development strategy; and as a stand-alone heritage management strategy. The integrated model, which combines the value-based essence of heritage with its potential for innovative use in development governance, is found to be the most effective. The conclusions emphasize the importance of a comprehensive approach to heritage, community engagement, adherence to the principle of intergenerational equity, and the creation of institutional conditions for embedding cultural heritage into the governance practices of territorial communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Analysis
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2025.01.628
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing cultural heritage as a component of local-level sustainable development

Dmytro Khudyk
Economic Analysis
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Managing cultural heritage as a component of local-level sustainable development

Dmytro Khudyk
article en

Abstract

In the current context of advancing sustainable development at the local level, cultural heritage is gaining recognition as an endogenous resource that contributes to shaping the identity of territorial communities, strengthening social capital, and stimulating economic activity. Despite its significant potential, the mechanisms for integrating heritage into strategic community development planning remain fragmented. The purpose of this article is to substantiate the role of cultural heritage as an instrument for ensuring sustainable development in territorial communities and to explore models for incorporating heritage into local policy frameworks. The methodological basis of the study includes a systems approach, analysis of legal and regulatory acts, local development strategies, scientific literature, and international practices. Comparative analysis methods were applied to evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches to heritage programming. The study classifies types of cultural heritage and characterizes their influence on the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. It identifies three models for integrating heritage into local development strategies: as a mandatory heritage protection program; as an embedded component of the general development strategy; and as a stand-alone heritage management strategy. The integrated model, which combines the value-based essence of heritage with its potential for innovative use in development governance, is found to be the most effective. The conclusions emphasize the importance of a comprehensive approach to heritage, community engagement, adherence to the principle of intergenerational equity, and the creation of institutional conditions for embedding cultural heritage into the governance practices of territorial communities.

Economic Analysis(35(1))
West Ukrainian National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.