‘We are like mice here, in a lab!’ Visibility as a reflexive tool for qualitative research

The article develops visibility as a tool for qualitative research. Visibility carries positionality further: it allows to analyse the researcher's effects not only on the knowledge produced, but also on research participants’ standing and power positions. This is especially relevant in research with marginalized people. Building on visibility concepts advanced in social and political theory, I develop enabling and constraining types of (in)visibility and trace them in my own ethnographic fieldwork conducted with refugees and asylum seekers in Berlin and Vienna in 2019 and 2020. The analysis reveals that even when researchers aim to create enabling types of (in)visibility, their practices of seeing can always also have unintended, more constraining consequences. Visibility allows for and invites honest reflection on this ambiguity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941251350902
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘We are like mice here, in a lab!’ Visibility as a reflexive tool for qualitative research

Amelie Harbisch
Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

‘We are like mice here, in a lab!’ Visibility as a reflexive tool for qualitative research

Amelie Harbisch
article en

Abstract

The article develops visibility as a tool for qualitative research. Visibility carries positionality further: it allows to analyse the researcher's effects not only on the knowledge produced, but also on research participants’ standing and power positions. This is especially relevant in research with marginalized people. Building on visibility concepts advanced in social and political theory, I develop enabling and constraining types of (in)visibility and trace them in my own ethnographic fieldwork conducted with refugees and asylum seekers in Berlin and Vienna in 2019 and 2020. The analysis reveals that even when researchers aim to create enabling types of (in)visibility, their practices of seeing can always also have unintended, more constraining consequences. Visibility allows for and invites honest reflection on this ambiguity.

Qualitative Research
University of Erfurt (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Freie Universität Berlin
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘We are like mice here, in a lab!’ Visibility as a reflexive tool for qualitative research — Amelie Harbisch · Qualitative Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS