Bone Biopsy Microbiology Does Not Explain Clinical Severity in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is the most frequent infection in diabetes-related foot ulcers, often associated with delayed healing, prolonged hospitalization, and increased risk of amputation. The contribution of microbiological factors to its clinical severity remains uncertain. While severe cases are often associated with soft tissue complications such as abscesses or necrotizing infections, it is unclear whether the bacterial profile influences infection severity. This study aimed to determine whether severe presentations are associated with a higher frequency of polymicrobial infections, multidrug-resistant organisms, or specific bacterial species. We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections confirmed to involve osteomyelitis through histopathological evaluation. Bacterial species isolated from bone biopsy cultures were compared between moderate and severe cases. Among 114 patients included, 73 were classified as moderate and 41 as severe. Bone cultures were positive in 101 cases, yielding 173 isolates. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was the most frequently isolated species, followed by <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i>. No significant differences were found between severity groups in the distribution of individual species, polymicrobial cultures (46.6% in moderate vs 56.1% in severe; p = 0.435), or multidrug-resistant organisms (12.3% vs 12.2%; p = 1.000). A global comparison of species distribution also showed no statistical association with severity (p = 0.941). These findings suggest that severity is not explained by the microbiological profile identified through conventional aerobic cultures. Instead, host-related or anatomical factors may be more relevant, although the lack of anaerobic cultures may have underestimated microbial diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251353684
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bone Biopsy Microbiology Does Not Explain Clinical Severity in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Gerardo Víquez‐Molina, Javier Aragón‐Sánchez, José María Rojas‐Bonilla
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Bone Biopsy Microbiology Does Not Explain Clinical Severity in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Gerardo Víquez‐Molina, Javier Aragón‐Sánchez, José María Rojas‐Bonilla
article en

Abstract

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis is the most frequent infection in diabetes-related foot ulcers, often associated with delayed healing, prolonged hospitalization, and increased risk of amputation. The contribution of microbiological factors to its clinical severity remains uncertain. While severe cases are often associated with soft tissue complications such as abscesses or necrotizing infections, it is unclear whether the bacterial profile influences infection severity. This study aimed to determine whether severe presentations are associated with a higher frequency of polymicrobial infections, multidrug-resistant organisms, or specific bacterial species. We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with moderate or severe diabetic foot infections confirmed to involve osteomyelitis through histopathological evaluation. Bacterial species isolated from bone biopsy cultures were compared between moderate and severe cases. Among 114 patients included, 73 were classified as moderate and 41 as severe. Bone cultures were positive in 101 cases, yielding 173 isolates. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was the most frequently isolated species, followed by <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i>. No significant differences were found between severity groups in the distribution of individual species, polymicrobial cultures (46.6% in moderate vs 56.1% in severe; p = 0.435), or multidrug-resistant organisms (12.3% vs 12.2%; p = 1.000). A global comparison of species distribution also showed no statistical association with severity (p = 0.941). These findings suggest that severity is not explained by the microbiological profile identified through conventional aerobic cultures. Instead, host-related or anatomical factors may be more relevant, although the lack of anaerobic cultures may have underestimated microbial diversity.

The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
Hospital La Paloma (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.