Does Digital Justice Contribute to Firm Innovation? Evidence from China’s Internet Courts

This paper examines the impact of Internet courts on firm innovation, emphasizing the role of digital judicial protection. Using a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) approach and data from Chinese listed companies, we find that the establishment of Internet courts significantly enhances firm innovation, a result robust across multiple tests. Mechanism analysis reveals that Internet courts promote innovation by increasing firms’ willingness to innovate and accelerating digital transformation. Heterogeneity analysis highlights stronger effects in Internet-related services, industrial digitization sectors, private firms, and firms facing high litigation risks, likely due to their greater reliance on digital justice systems. These findings provide novel evidence linking digital justice systems to firm innovation and offer actionable insights for fostering innovation through judicial reforms in the digital era. JEL: K41, O32, P37.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251340457
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Digital Justice Contribute to Firm Innovation? Evidence from China’s Internet Courts

Huaxing Wang, Weiwei Li, Liangcong Fan, Yang Feng
2 citations
SAGE Open
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
article

Does Digital Justice Contribute to Firm Innovation? Evidence from China’s Internet Courts

Huaxing Wang, Weiwei Li, Liangcong Fan, Yang Feng
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of Internet courts on firm innovation, emphasizing the role of digital judicial protection. Using a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) approach and data from Chinese listed companies, we find that the establishment of Internet courts significantly enhances firm innovation, a result robust across multiple tests. Mechanism analysis reveals that Internet courts promote innovation by increasing firms’ willingness to innovate and accelerating digital transformation. Heterogeneity analysis highlights stronger effects in Internet-related services, industrial digitization sectors, private firms, and firms facing high litigation risks, likely due to their greater reliance on digital justice systems. These findings provide novel evidence linking digital justice systems to firm innovation and offer actionable insights for fostering innovation through judicial reforms in the digital era. JEL: K41, O32, P37.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(2)
Hangzhou Wanxiang Polytechnic (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Finance and Governance
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Digital Justice Contribute to Firm Innovation? Evidence from China’s Internet Courts — Huaxing Wang, Weiwei Li, et al. · SAGE Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS