Thermal comfort model for classrooms using occupant-centered approach

Using Grounded Theory (GT) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this mixed-methods study explores how architecture students' and graduates' understanding of thermal comfort evolves. Focus groups (FG-1 to FG-3) across three educational levels showed that perceptions mature from a basic focus on building design to a sophisticated understanding encompassing behavioural, psychological, and climatic factors. This led to four frameworks (FW-1 to FW-4), culminating in a comprehensive Thermal Comfort Evaluation Framework (FW-4) integrating building performance, climatic conditions, and occupant responses throughout design. A novel occupant-centred model synthesises AHP-weighted priorities and GT themes, structured around building performance (type, exterior, interior), climatic conditons (temperature, humidity, air velocity), and occupant (psychological and behavioural) factors. This model reflects the interplay of controllable and uncontrollable variables impacting thermal perception and productivity, offering a robust decision-making design model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106589
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermal comfort model for classrooms using occupant-centered approach

Muhammad Nasir Bashir, Muhammad Mahmood Ali, Huda Riaz, Irfan Anjum Badruddin et al.
2 citations
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
2.01
article

Thermal comfort model for classrooms using occupant-centered approach

Muhammad Nasir Bashir, Muhammad Mahmood Ali, Huda Riaz, Irfan Anjum Badruddin, Sumra Yousuf, Sabahat Arif
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Using Grounded Theory (GT) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this mixed-methods study explores how architecture students' and graduates' understanding of thermal comfort evolves. Focus groups (FG-1 to FG-3) across three educational levels showed that perceptions mature from a basic focus on building design to a sophisticated understanding encompassing behavioural, psychological, and climatic factors. This led to four frameworks (FW-1 to FW-4), culminating in a comprehensive Thermal Comfort Evaluation Framework (FW-4) integrating building performance, climatic conditions, and occupant responses throughout design. A novel occupant-centred model synthesises AHP-weighted priorities and GT themes, structured around building performance (type, exterior, interior), climatic conditons (temperature, humidity, air velocity), and occupant (psychological and behavioural) factors. This model reflects the interplay of controllable and uncontrollable variables impacting thermal perception and productivity, offering a robust decision-making design model.

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 73
Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK), University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK), Yonsei University (KR), Institute of Technology Sligo (IE), King Khalid University (SA)
King Khalid University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.