Literary Shifts. The Obscene Bird Sings Again: Tale of a Tortured Translation

This essay examines the translation history of José Donoso’s The Obscene Bird of Night and its impact on the novel’s reception in the English-speaking world. Spanning four decades, the translation saga involves significant omissions and alterations by Hardie St. Martin and Leonard Mades, which compromised the text’s structural and thematic integrity. The essay juxtaposes the flawed original translation with Megan McDowell’s recent corrective effort, highlighting her success in restoring critical omissions without producing a full retranslation. Using Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizomatic theory, the analysis positions Donoso’s masterpiece as a text that defies hierarchical structures, embracing multiplicity, connection, and asignification. It further argues that translation, as an extension of the rhizome, should preserve these qualities. Ultimately, this essay calls for a renewed appreciation of The Obscene Bird of Night as a polyphonic and meticulously constructed work of art, and it reflects on the broader implications of translation practices for literary masterpieces.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Estudios del Observatorio/Observatorio Studies
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15427/or096-04/2025en
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Literary Shifts. The Obscene Bird Sings Again: Tale of a Tortured Translation

Alejandro Martín López
Estudios del Observatorio/Observatorio Studies
Race, History, and American Society
article

Literary Shifts. The Obscene Bird Sings Again: Tale of a Tortured Translation

Alejandro Martín López
article en

Abstract

This essay examines the translation history of José Donoso’s The Obscene Bird of Night and its impact on the novel’s reception in the English-speaking world. Spanning four decades, the translation saga involves significant omissions and alterations by Hardie St. Martin and Leonard Mades, which compromised the text’s structural and thematic integrity. The essay juxtaposes the flawed original translation with Megan McDowell’s recent corrective effort, highlighting her success in restoring critical omissions without producing a full retranslation. Using Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizomatic theory, the analysis positions Donoso’s masterpiece as a text that defies hierarchical structures, embracing multiplicity, connection, and asignification. It further argues that translation, as an extension of the rhizome, should preserve these qualities. Ultimately, this essay calls for a renewed appreciation of The Obscene Bird of Night as a polyphonic and meticulously constructed work of art, and it reflects on the broader implications of translation practices for literary masterpieces.

Estudios del Observatorio/Observatorio Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.