Key quality dimensions for gluten-free bread perceived by general and non-gluten consumers: A case study with apple pomace and flaxseed

• Gluten-free breads with 6% apple pomace and 12% flaxseed had the best sensory profile. • The bread tailored was highly rated by both, celiac consumers and general population • Gluten-free consumers provided more detailed sensory feedback, especially on texture • Attributes loading positively and negatively on acceptability were identified. • A decision tree was proposed to estimate acceptance as a tool for sensory analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the sensory perception of a gluten-free bread formulated with sustainable and locally sourced ingredients: apple pomace and flaxseed. Sensory evaluation was performed with gluten-free and gluten consumers to analyze the differences in perception based on consumption patterns and to identify the key quality attributes influencing acceptability. Results showed that the formulations containing up to 6% apple pomace and 12% flaxseed resulted in the most acceptable products for both consumers group. However, higher levels of apple pomace (10%) led to lower scores, and no significant differences in overall acceptability were found between both consumers groups. Nevertheless, gluten-free consumers tended to provide more detailed sensory descriptions, particularly for texture attributes, likely due to their need to evaluate newly formulated products with a great variability in their characteristics. “Crispy”, “Light texture” and “artisan-like appearance”, among others, were identified as positive attributes, while “rubbery” emerged as the main negative factor affecting acceptability. Based on these findings, a decision tree was proposed as a tool to evaluate gluten-free bread, balancing defects and positive sensory characteristics. This approach could guide manufacturers in developing gluten-free breads that meet the expectations of people with different consumption patterns

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Foods
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100696
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key quality dimensions for gluten-free bread perceived by general and non-gluten consumers: A case study with apple pomace and flaxseed

Olaia Martínez, J. Salmerón, Iñaki Etaio, Francisco José Pérez Elortondo et al.
Future Foods
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

Key quality dimensions for gluten-free bread perceived by general and non-gluten consumers: A case study with apple pomace and flaxseed

Olaia Martínez, J. Salmerón, Iñaki Etaio, Francisco José Pérez Elortondo, Jonatan Miranda, M. Ojeda, Edurne Simón, Leire Cantero-Ruiz de Eguino
article en

Abstract

• Gluten-free breads with 6% apple pomace and 12% flaxseed had the best sensory profile. • The bread tailored was highly rated by both, celiac consumers and general population • Gluten-free consumers provided more detailed sensory feedback, especially on texture • Attributes loading positively and negatively on acceptability were identified. • A decision tree was proposed to estimate acceptance as a tool for sensory analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the sensory perception of a gluten-free bread formulated with sustainable and locally sourced ingredients: apple pomace and flaxseed. Sensory evaluation was performed with gluten-free and gluten consumers to analyze the differences in perception based on consumption patterns and to identify the key quality attributes influencing acceptability. Results showed that the formulations containing up to 6% apple pomace and 12% flaxseed resulted in the most acceptable products for both consumers group. However, higher levels of apple pomace (10%) led to lower scores, and no significant differences in overall acceptability were found between both consumers groups. Nevertheless, gluten-free consumers tended to provide more detailed sensory descriptions, particularly for texture attributes, likely due to their need to evaluate newly formulated products with a great variability in their characteristics. “Crispy”, “Light texture” and “artisan-like appearance”, among others, were identified as positive attributes, while “rubbery” emerged as the main negative factor affecting acceptability. Based on these findings, a decision tree was proposed as a tool to evaluate gluten-free bread, balancing defects and positive sensory characteristics. This approach could guide manufacturers in developing gluten-free breads that meet the expectations of people with different consumption patterns

Future FoodsVol. 12
University of the Basque Country (ES), Centro de Tecnologías Aeronauticas (Spain) (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Eusko Jaurlaritza, European Regional Development Fund
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.