Institutional Challenges of the Ecological Transition

The ecological transition is often presented primarily in terms of financial costs. Mainstream economists support green finance, selective ecological regulations, and carbon pricing, claiming these tools are sufficient to address environmental issues. In contrast, heterodox economists argue that the neoclassical paradigm is fundamentally incompatible with ecological transition. They stress the need for deep structural reforms in finance and monetary policy, or a broader economic shift guided by degrowth principles. This article contends that achieving the ecological transition necessitates moving beyond the neoclassical economic framework. However, it also demonstrates that existing heterodox approaches fail to provide adequate institutional alternatives. The core challenge lies not in financing or degrowth per se but in reallocating physical resources and labor toward producing essential goods and services that may not deliver immediate consumer satisfaction. From this perspective, the ecological transition is fundamentally a democratic issue. JEL Classification : B52, P16, Q54, Q56

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Radical Political Economics
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134251343650
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional Challenges of the Ecological Transition

David Cayla
Review of Radical Political Economics
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
article

Institutional Challenges of the Ecological Transition

David Cayla
article en

Abstract

The ecological transition is often presented primarily in terms of financial costs. Mainstream economists support green finance, selective ecological regulations, and carbon pricing, claiming these tools are sufficient to address environmental issues. In contrast, heterodox economists argue that the neoclassical paradigm is fundamentally incompatible with ecological transition. They stress the need for deep structural reforms in finance and monetary policy, or a broader economic shift guided by degrowth principles. This article contends that achieving the ecological transition necessitates moving beyond the neoclassical economic framework. However, it also demonstrates that existing heterodox approaches fail to provide adequate institutional alternatives. The core challenge lies not in financing or degrowth per se but in reallocating physical resources and labor toward producing essential goods and services that may not deliver immediate consumer satisfaction. From this perspective, the ecological transition is fundamentally a democratic issue. JEL Classification : B52, P16, Q54, Q56

Review of Radical Political EconomicsVol. 57(4)
Université d'Angers (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.