Thermodynamic modeling and techno-economic assessment of hydrogen fuelled diabatic compressed air energy storage configurations
• Systematic thermodynamic and techno-economic assessment of diabatic CAES. • Maximum roundtrip efficiencies: 47.4 % (non-recuperative) and 60% (recuperative). • Thermodynamic optimization yields best economic performance. • For hydrogen price of 1.23 €/kg: payback at 16.7 years. • Base case scenario: levelized cost of storage equal to 66.9 to 90.7 €/kWh e.. This work provides a combined thermodynamic and techno-economic assessment framework of hydrogen-fuelled diabatic CAES (D-CAES) systems as a solution to enhance performance and enable decarbonized energy storage. The central hypothesis is that optimizing compression and expansion subsystem designs-particularly through the use of recuperation and high-temperature hydrogen combustion-can significantly improve both thermodynamic and techno-economic outcomes. Steady-state modelling is performed in AspenPlus for various D-CAES configurations featuring two to four compressors and either non-recuperative or recuperative expansion. A parametric analysis explores the effects of intermediate discharge/expansion pressures and combustion temperatures on system performance. Results show that expansion design strongly influences roundtrip efficiency, with values reaching 47.4% for non-recuperative and 60.0% for recuperative systems. In contrast, the number of compressors and intermediate pressures has a negligible impact on efficiency. A techno-economic assessment is conducted assuming energy arbitrage under European market conditions, using a bottom-up approach to estimate capital investment and storage cavern costs. Despite higher capital expenditure, the configuration with four compressors, high combustion/turbine inlet temperatures, and recuperative expansion delivers the best economic performance. Under a base-case scenario with green hydrogen priced at 1.23 €/kg, the system achieves a 16.7-year payback period, a 9.4% internal rate of return, and a levelized cost of electricity ( LCOE ) between 66.9 and 90.7 €/MWh e . However, at current hydrogen prices, the investment does not achieve payback and the LCOE ranges from 190 to 325 €/MWh e , being significantly higher than the LCOE of pumped hydro storage and batteries.
Authors
- Konstantinos Braimakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9489-8322)
- Sotiriοs Karellas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-7134)
- Tryfon C. Roumpedakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-1206)
- Haris Avgerinou
Institutions
- National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Applied Thermal Engineering
- Published
- 2025-06-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.127325
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.14