Do dogs form reputations of humans? No effect of age after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation

Animals can form reputations of individuals through direct interactions or by observing interactions with a third party, known as eavesdropping. Given their cooperative relationship with humans, considerable interest has focused on whether dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) can socially evaluate humans, though findings remain mixed. To assess whether this ability develops during ontogeny, we investigated whether dogs of different ages (young, adult, and senior) can form reputations of humans after observing them interact with a conspecific or through direct interactions in a food-giving situation. Forty pet dogs participated in the experiment. In the eavesdropping condition, dogs observed two humans interact with a dog demonstrator-one was generous and fed the dog, while the other was selfish and withheld food. In the direct experience condition, dogs interacted with the two partners directly. We analysed dogs' first choice and time spent exhibiting affiliative behaviours towards each partner. Results showed that dogs across all age groups did not significantly prefer the generous partner compared to the selfish partner, nor did their behaviour exceed chance levels following indirect or direct experience. These findings do not provide support for dogs showing reputation formation and highlight the methodological complexities of studying this phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Cognition
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-025-01967-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do dogs form reputations of humans? No effect of age after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation

Sarah Marshall‐Pescini, Hoi-Lam Jim, Friederike Range, Elisa Martinelli et al.
1 citations
Animal Cognition
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
article

Do dogs form reputations of humans? No effect of age after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation

Sarah Marshall‐Pescini, Hoi-Lam Jim, Friederike Range, Elisa Martinelli, Mayte Martínez, Kadisha Belfiore
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Animals can form reputations of individuals through direct interactions or by observing interactions with a third party, known as eavesdropping. Given their cooperative relationship with humans, considerable interest has focused on whether dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) can socially evaluate humans, though findings remain mixed. To assess whether this ability develops during ontogeny, we investigated whether dogs of different ages (young, adult, and senior) can form reputations of humans after observing them interact with a conspecific or through direct interactions in a food-giving situation. Forty pet dogs participated in the experiment. In the eavesdropping condition, dogs observed two humans interact with a dog demonstrator-one was generous and fed the dog, while the other was selfish and withheld food. In the direct experience condition, dogs interacted with the two partners directly. We analysed dogs' first choice and time spent exhibiting affiliative behaviours towards each partner. Results showed that dogs across all age groups did not significantly prefer the generous partner compared to the selfish partner, nor did their behaviour exceed chance levels following indirect or direct experience. These findings do not provide support for dogs showing reputation formation and highlight the methodological complexities of studying this phenomenon.

Animal CognitionVol. 28(1)
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research (AT), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP), Kyoto University (JP), University of Michigan (US)
Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.