Comparison of Claude (Sonnet and Opus) and ChatGPT (GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-o1) in Analyzing Educational Image-Based Questions from Block-Based Programming Assessments

This study presented a novel application of OpenAI's GPT-o1 model for analyzing educational image-based questions derived from block-based programming assessments, contributing to the first systematic exploration of this advanced AI model in this field. We evaluated GPT-o1 alongside other state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o mini, Claude3.5 Sonnet, and Claude-3 Opus, to assess their accuracy in solving multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank questions from a standardized block-based programming test. Our findings demonstrated that GPT-o1 significantly outperformed other models, achieving an accuracy of 80 %, which we attributed to its enhanced image analysis capabilities. Comparative analyses revealed GPT-01's superior performance in interpreting and responding to visual prompts, particularly in tasks requiring logical reasoning and computational thinking. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation test highlighted significant relationships between GPT-o1 and GPT-4o. Our contributions highlighted the potential applications of advanced chatbots in block-based programming education. These technologies can serve as personalized learning tutors to guide students in understanding and solving block-based programming tasks independently. Additionally, they can assist educators in automating the grading process and generating tailored programming exercises, thus improving teaching efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iciet66371.2025.11046263
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Claude (Sonnet and Opus) and ChatGPT (GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-o1) in Analyzing Educational Image-Based Questions from Block-Based Programming Assessments

Wan Chong Choi, Iek Chong Choi, Chi In Chang, L. Lam
2 citations
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
article

Comparison of Claude (Sonnet and Opus) and ChatGPT (GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-o1) in Analyzing Educational Image-Based Questions from Block-Based Programming Assessments

Wan Chong Choi, Iek Chong Choi, Chi In Chang, L. Lam
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study presented a novel application of OpenAI's GPT-o1 model for analyzing educational image-based questions derived from block-based programming assessments, contributing to the first systematic exploration of this advanced AI model in this field. We evaluated GPT-o1 alongside other state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o mini, Claude3.5 Sonnet, and Claude-3 Opus, to assess their accuracy in solving multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank questions from a standardized block-based programming test. Our findings demonstrated that GPT-o1 significantly outperformed other models, achieving an accuracy of 80 %, which we attributed to its enhanced image analysis capabilities. Comparative analyses revealed GPT-01's superior performance in interpreting and responding to visual prompts, particularly in tasks requiring logical reasoning and computational thinking. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation test highlighted significant relationships between GPT-o1 and GPT-4o. Our contributions highlighted the potential applications of advanced chatbots in block-based programming education. These technologies can serve as personalized learning tutors to guide students in understanding and solving block-based programming tasks independently. Additionally, they can assist educators in automating the grading process and generating tailored programming exercises, thus improving teaching efficiency.

Northern Arizona University (US), Golden Gate University (US), Macao Polytechnic University (MO), City University of Macau (MO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.